Endomorphism Ring: Proving f(R) = E

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pietjuh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the endomorphism ring E, defined as { f in End(R+) | f(xr) = f(x)r for all x,r in R }, is isomorphic to the ring R. The approach involves using the left multiplication map L_r: R+ --> R+, which is an injective homomorphism from R to End(R+). The key challenge is demonstrating that E is a subring of End(R+) and that f(R) equals E. It is established that any function g in E can be expressed as g(x) = agx, indicating that E consists of left-multiplications. The conclusion is that since E meets the criteria for left-multiplications, it follows that f(R) = E, thus proving the isomorphism.
Pietjuh
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a problem about the endomorphism ring:
Let R be a ring. Show that R is isomorphic to E = { f in End(R+) | f(xr) = f(x)r for all x,r in R }

I'm trying to do it with the following theorem in our lecture notes:
Let R be a ring and R+ the additive group of R. Let for r in R, L_r: R+ --> R+ : x |--> rx be the left multiplication map. Then f: R --> End(R+): r |--> L_r is a injective homomorphism, and R is isomorphic to a subring of End(R+), which is f(R).

I had the following strategy in mind: If I can show that E is a subring of End(R+) and that f(R) = E, the statement is proved. I almost succeeded with it, but I had a small problem on the end proving the equality of f(R) and E.

To show that f(R) lies in E isn't that hard. Because L_r (xy) = rxy = L_r(x) y, so L_r satisfies the conditions. But I couldn't figure out how to show that E lies in f(R).

Could anyone help me with this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EDIT: I had written a lot but I see most of it was unnecessary. You want to show that R is isomoprhic to E, and there is a natural function f (the one given in your post) which you know to be injective and homomorphic, you just need to show that f(R) = E. f(R) is the sub-ring of left-multiplications, so you want to show that E is the sub-ring of left-multiplications. Any element g in E satisfies the property that for all x, r in R, we have:

g(xr) = g(x)r

from this we can deduce:

g(x) = g(1x) = g(1)x

Let g(1) = ag. Then we can say that E consists of all functions of the form:

g(x) = agx

where ag is in R. Clearly, each g is a left-multiplication, and since E consists of all such functions (i.e. since all left-multiplications g satisfy g in End(R+), g(xr) = g(x)r for all x, r in R), we deduce that E is indeed the sub-ring of left-multiplications, so f(R) = E.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top