Energy Acceptance in Electron Storage Rings

dgonnella89
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a research project involving calculations about various aspects of electron storage rings and have come across the term energy acceptance or energy aperture. Could someone explain to me what is meant by this term? It is used in a lot of literature but I haven't been able to find a good definition.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electron accelerators and storage rings are usually above 1 or 2 GeV. They are usually used for synchrotron radiation sources, external electron beams, or sometimes colliding beams. There are several facilities in the U. S.; Brookhaven, Argonne. Jefferson, Lawrence Berkeley, Cornell, Madison, to name a few. In addition to the longitudinal energy, the beams have transverse energy. This comes about because the electrons in the bunches, often about 1 nanoCoulomb (nC), are all mutually repelled by Coulomb forces, and therefore oscillate back and forth transversely, focused by the quadrupoles (strong focusing). The transverse aperture of the machine has an aperture limit, called the acceptance. The beam has a transverse size, called the emittance (units = mm-mrad). If the transverse emittance exceeds the acceptance, electrons are lost (hit the aperture). Similarly, in the longitudinal (energy) coordinate, electrons oscillate back and forth in the stable RF "bucket", and if the longitudinal emittance (units=eV-sec) exceeds the longitudinal acceptance, they are lost. Electrons continuously radiate away lots of energy (synchrotron radiation) and need to replace that energy every turn in RF cavities. An electron with above average energy takes longer to go around the ring ("above transition") and gets less acceleration the next time around (phase stability).
Bob S
 
Last edited:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top