Energy and Momentum [Spring (word problem)]

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a spring energy and momentum problem, where participants analyze the equations for kinetic and potential energy in relation to a compressed spring. The calculations for potential energy (EPSpring) and kinetic energy (EK) are presented, with one participant confirming their understanding of the initial conditions. There is significant confusion regarding the problem's clarity, particularly about the compression of the spring and the velocity of the attached object after release. Participants emphasize the need for clear assumptions in solving the problem, as the lack of specificity regarding force application and maximum compression complicates the analysis. Overall, the consensus is that the problem is poorly constructed, leading to ambiguity in the expected answers.
AlexisFair
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

Homework4.jpg
[/B]

Please check the attachments as to view the questions.

Homework Equations



Ek= 1/2 mv^2

EPSpring= 1/2 kx^2

The Attempt at a Solution



A) EPSpring= 1/2 kx^2

1/2 (100)(0.11) ^2
=0.605 JB) Is ok I understand it.

C)

EKO=EKFEPSpring(Initial) + EK(Initial) = EPSpring(Final) + EK(Final)
½ kx^2 + ½ mv^2 = ½ kx^2 + ½ mv^20.605 J + 0 J = ½ (100) (0.055) ^2 + ½ (0.065) v^2V= 3.74 m/s

Is this correct? Also, for EK(Initial) it is 0 J because it is being "compressed" 11 cm and thus it has no speed, correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks fine to me. The question is not very clear but I agree you should assume that the spring is compressed 11 cm and then let go with the object attached to the end.

AM
 
Part c is so unclear you should not be penalised for giving the wrong answer.

I think they mean it's compressed 11cm, then released, and they want to know the velocity after the object has traveled 5.5cm.

5.5cm is half of 11cm so it does not matter if the 5.5cm is measured from the initial rest position or the compressed position.
 
This is a truly poorly constructed problem.

1. The problem doesn't specify whether the force is applied for some time (how long?) and then removed, or whether it remains in effect. Either will result in SHM, so that's not diagnostic. Why do they say that the force is exerted on the spring, rather than on the object? It's a strange assertion even if it proves to be inconsequential.

2. They ask about the work done compressing the spring by a given amount, but they don't tell you that this is the maximum compression so it leaves you guessing as to whether or not it informs you about the SHM in any way.

3. The speed of the object at a given location in its travels will depend on whether or not the applied force was constant or removed (the equilibrium location depends upon this) and you still don't know if you're working with the maximum compression or not from part (a).

The best you can do is to make and state assumptions that don't contradict what is given, then answer the questions based upon those assumptions. You can't be faulted if your assumptions are clear and justifiable.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top