Energy Carried by Electromagnetic Waves- why is it wrong?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving the calculation of energy densities and wave intensity from a monochromatic light source emitting 110 W of electromagnetic power. The participant correctly calculates the wave intensity as 0.9726 W/m² but struggles with the average electric and magnetic field energy densities, both of which should be equal. They attempt various equations, including the Poynting vector and energy density formulas, but consistently arrive at incorrect values. The confusion stems from the interpretation of the equations provided in their textbook, particularly regarding the average Poynting vector and its relationship to energy density. The correct approach involves understanding the spherical wave propagation and applying the appropriate formulas accurately.
edlin
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Energy Carried by Electromagnetic Waves- why is it wrong?

Hi! I have this homework problem that I just don't understand why it's wrong.

A monochromatic light source emits 110 W of electromagnetic power uniformly in all directions.

(a) Calculate the average electric-field energy density 3.00 m from the source.

(b) Calculate the average magnetic-field energy density at the same distance from the source.

(c) Find the wave intensity at this location.



First of all, I know that (a) and (b) will be the same. I have also calculate part (c), which is correct, and it is 0.9726 W/m^2.


I have used various equations that would work for this type of problems.

1. The Sav, or average Poynting vector, in terms of the magnetic and electric field. I always get the same answer, which is 6.4*10^-8. Then I use the energy density equation, which gives me 3*10^-9.

2. I use Sav=cu...since I have Sav, and I know c, then it seemed logical to use this. My answer is the same, 3*10^-9.

But its WRONG, and I don't understand WHY! PLEASE HELP ME.

Thankyou!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all what does it mean that "A monochromatic light source emits 110 W of electromagnetic power uniformly in all directions."? I think it means that you have a source that radiates spherical waves and the average flux of the Poynting vectors through a spherical surface centered on the source is of 110W. In particular, taking the sphere to be of radius 3.00 m, this gives

110=<\oint_{\mathbb{S}_3} \vec{S}(\vec{r}=3\hat{r})\cdot\hat{n}dA >= <\int_0^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi} ||\vec{E}(\vec{r}=3\hat{r})\times\vec{H}(\vec{r}=3\hat{r})|| 3^2 sin\theta d\phi d\theta >=36\pi <E(\vec{r}=3\hat{r})H(\vec{r}=3\hat{r})>

But in a monochromatic plane wave propagating in the void, H=E/\mu_0 c= so we have the equation

\frac{110\mu_0 c}{36\pi } =<E(\vec{r}=3\hat{r})^2>

Now you can substitute that into the formula for the average mean electric energy:

<u_E(\vec{r}=3\hat{r})>=\frac{\epsilon_0<E(\vec{r}=3\hat{r})^2>}{2} =\frac{110\epsilon_0\mu_0 c}{72\pi }=\frac{110}{72\pi c}\approx 1.62\times 10^{-9} [J/m^3]

What is the correct answer?

(I don't know what equations are given to you; if you write them I can help you sort out your problem using those equations)
 
Last edited:
I took a bit more simplistic approach and just calculated the energy density from the rate of energy flowing through the surface (power) and the speed of light. Looks to me like the total energy density is

u = P/Ac = 3.24*10^-9 J/m³
 
Actually...the equations that are given in the book are very general, and none of them involve integrals.

I have used the third equatin below Poynting vector.



ph207-6-eqn15.GIF


And I also used Saverage/c=uaverage...but it's still wrong.
 
I just divided the 3.24 by 2, which gave me the answer.

The reason why I did not get it, I think, is because the book does not present it correctly.

The Smax equation in the picture above is actually given as Sav in my book, so that's why the answer was not correct.

Thank you so much!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top