Energy conservation equation problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the energy conservation equation in a circuit with a capacitor connected to a constant source. It highlights the discrepancy in energy calculations when assuming zero resistance, as the work done by the source and the energy stored in the capacitor do not match. Participants emphasize that in practical scenarios, all wires have some resistance, leading to energy loss as heat. Theoretical considerations of superconductors are introduced, suggesting that even in ideal conditions, inductance in the circuit can cause energy to radiate as electromagnetic waves. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the complexities of energy conservation in electrical circuits.
panzer1234
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A capacity(C) connects directly to a constant source(E); total resistant is zero. When the capacity has been charged already, it has energy :1/2CE^2. The work done by the source
is CE^2. Comparing two of them leads to an error of the energy conservation equation. What's wrong with it?

When the total resistant is not zero, we can calculate that the energy (CE^2-1/2CE^2) will be the heat that come out from the resistant. This satisfy the energy conservation equation.

How can we explain it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi panzer1234! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)

i'd just say that there's no such thing as a wire with zero resistance …

the wire must have some resistance, and as you say half the energy will be converted to heat in the wire :smile:

(btw, it's a capacitor and it has capacitance :wink:)
 


suppose that the wire is made from super conductor material, so its resistant is zero, or we can have sth like that. Generally, i just want to consider the problem in theorem, so what is the fault?
 
hmm …

there must be an ordinary wire connecting to each end of the superconductor, and every voltage source has an internal resistance anyway …

so I'm staying with my previous answer …

there's no such thing as a wire with zero resistance

and there's no such thing as a free lunch :biggrin:
 


I agree with u that there is no such thing as a wire with zero resistance, in practice. However, I just want to consider the problem in theorem, that means there is no resistance. I wonder if the energy come out from the circuit as an electromagnetics wave. Please take a serious look at it.
P/S: I'm not an English native speaker, so please forgive me if my language confuses you :biggrin:
 
panzer1234 said:
I agree with u that there is no such thing as a wire with zero resistance, in practice. However, I just want to consider the problem in theorem, that means there is no resistance.

(you mean "in theory" :wink:)

yes, but even in theory there's no such thing as a wire with zero resistance …

the energy will always go into heating the connecting wire :smile:
 


tiny-tim said:
(you mean "in theory" :wink:)

yes, but even in theory there's no such thing as a wire with zero resistance …

the energy will always go into heating the connecting wire :smile:


In theory one could construct the circuit from superconducting material, which really does have zero resistance. Not just nearly zero, but really and truly zero. In place of the battery, use another much larger capacitor also made from superconducting materials. Assume that its capacitance is so large that charging the smaller capacitor will not significantly change its stored charge (or voltage).

However, even a perfectly straight piece of wire fraction of an inch long has inductance... so you end up with an LC circuit that will oscillate at some frequency and its harmonics, and so radiate the "excess" energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation.
 
Back
Top