Energy differences when climbing a flight of stairs

  • Thread starter Thread starter pavadrin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Flight
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of potential and kinetic energy in the context of climbing a flight of stairs. The original poster questions the relationship between these forms of energy at different heights and seeks clarification on their understanding of energy changes during this action.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how potential energy changes when climbing stairs and questions the corresponding changes in kinetic energy. Some participants affirm the potential energy increase and discuss the relationship between work done and energy forms, while others introduce concepts like angular momentum and its effect on kinetic energy.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the relationship between potential and kinetic energy. Some guidance has been offered regarding the work-energy principle, but multiple interpretations and concepts are being explored without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about energy forms and their definitions, as well as the implications of varying speeds while climbing stairs. The original poster's request for clarification indicates potential gaps in understanding that are being addressed through discussion.

pavadrin
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hey
If I were to climb a flight of stairs I would gain potential energy because I would be moving further away from the centre of the earth. However would I have more, less or equal amounts of kinetic energy at the top of the flight of stairs, or at the base and why would this be so? If what I had previously stated is also incorrect, could an explanation be provided on what the correct thesis is and why.
Thanks in advance to those who chose to reply,
Pavadrin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pavadrin said:
Hey
If I were to climb a flight of stairs I would gain potential energy because I would be moving further away from the centre of the earth.

Correct. You raised your potential energy by doing work, that is your legs pushed you up the flight of stairs. This energy can be recovered if you were to slide down the stairs on a tray (or whatever else will do without getting you into too much trouble). The work that you did pushing yourself up the stairs were "stored" in the system formed by your body and the earth.

Kinetic energy is not stored. It can be increased or decreased depending on the application of an external force. If the force works in the direction of the motion of the object it will increase its kinetic energy (it will move quicker) and vice versa.

Now coming back to climbing the stairs you need to do additional work, that is your legs need to push extra hard, if you want to go quickly up the stairs - you need to raise your potential energy and increase your kinetic energy.

If you are not in such a hurry your legs only need to push moderately hard in order to raise only your potential energy.

So it is completely up to you by how much your kinetic energy will differ at the top and the bottom of the stairs - it all depends on how eager you are to get up there.
 
pavadrin said:
Hey
If I were to climb a flight of stairs I would gain potential energy because I would be moving further away from the centre of the earth. However would I have more, less or equal amounts of kinetic energy at the top of the flight of stairs, or at the base and why would this be so? If what I had previously stated is also incorrect, could an explanation be provided on what the correct thesis is and why.
Thanks in advance to those who chose to reply,
Pavadrin
Your angular momentum increases when you move farther from the Earth's centre. So your kinetic energy would increase by:

[tex]\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2\Delta r = \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2h[/tex]

AM
 
thanks for the reply Andrew Mason and andrevdh
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K