Energy Eigenstates and Degeneracy: Proving Non-Commuting Observables

Bill Foster
Messages
334
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two observables A_1 and A_2, which do not involve time explicitly, are known not to commute,

\left[A_1,A_2\right]\ne 0

Yet they both commute with the Hamiltonian:

\left[A_1,H\right]=0
\left[A_2,H\right]=0

Prove that they energy eigenstates are, in general, degenerate.

Are there exceptions?

As an example, you may think of the central-force problem H=\frac{\textbf{p}^2}{2m}+V\left(r\right) with A_1 \rightarrow L_z, A_2 \rightarrow L_x

The Attempt at a Solution



If the Hamiltonian operates on the ket, we get:

H|n\rangle = E_n|n\rangle

If the A_n operates operate on the ket:

A_n|n\rangle = a_n|n\rangle

If the Hamiltonian operates on that:

H\left(A_n|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_n|n\rangle\right)

So:

H\left(A_1|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_1|n\rangle\right)
H\left(A_2|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_2|n\rangle\right)

These are non-degenerate, because a_1\ne a_2

Given this:

\left[A_1,A_2\right]\ne 0

That means A_1A_2-A_2A_1\ne 0

Which means A_1A_2 \ne A_2A_1

But

A_1A_2|n\rangle = a_1a_2|n\rangle

And

A_2A_1|n\rangle = a_2a_1|n\rangle

However: a_1a_2=a_2a_1, so

a_1a_2|n\rangle = a_2a_1|n\rangle

But

A_1A_2|n\rangle \ne A_2A_1|n\rangle

Now

H\left(A_1A_2|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_1a_2|n\rangle\right)

And

H\left(A_2A_1|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_2a_1|n\rangle\right)

So

E_n\left(a_1a_2|n\rangle\right) = E_n\left(a_2a_1|n\rangle\right)

And therefore they are degenerate.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
But I'm not really sure how to find an exception.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top