Calculating Work with Kinetic Energy in Orbit

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Journey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Orbit
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work done by an external force on a satellite moving from a higher orbit to a lower orbit, both gravitational potential energy (GPE) and kinetic energy (KE) must be considered. The initial and final GPE can be calculated using the formula GPE = -GMm/r, while the KE is determined by the satellite's velocity in each orbit. The correct approach involves setting up the equation GPEfinal + KEfinal = GPEinitial + KEinitial + Work of external force. The initial calculations provided were incorrect as they did not account for the increased velocity and corresponding kinetic energy at the lower orbit. Properly integrating these factors will yield the correct work done by the external force.
The_Journey
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 62kg satellite orbits the Earth with a radius of 3.3*10^7 m. A net external force acts on the satellite to an orbit of 7.7*10^6 m, what work must the external force do?


Homework Equations


W = integral of F with respect to d


The Attempt at a Solution



Integrate F which in this case is GMm/r^2 which becomes -GMm/r, then plug in the radii. However, the answer that I got was -2.46*10^9, which is incorrect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to include the kinetic energy as well, because the velocity of the satellite
in a lower orbit will be bigger
 
willem2 said:
You need to include the kinetic energy as well, because the velocity of the satellite
in a lower orbit will be bigger

How would I include the kinetic energy?

Would I approach it as this?

GPE = gravitational potential energy
KE = kinetic energy


GPEfinal + KEfinal = GPEinitial + KEinitial + Workof external force ?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top