Construct an Energy-Level Diagram for Element with 1.66e-18 J Ionization Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter elliotyang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagram
AI Thread Summary
An element with an ionization energy of 1.66 × 10^-18 J has three longest wavelengths in its absorption spectrum: 253.7 nm, 185.0 nm, and 158.5 nm. The energy corresponding to these wavelengths can be calculated using the formula E=hc/λ, revealing the energy differences between various orbital transitions. The ionization energy represents the limit, with transitions occurring at lower energy levels. The discussion emphasizes that the energy differences between transitions decrease as n increases, and the energy diagram should reflect these relative spacings. Ultimately, constructing the energy-level diagram involves comparing the calculated transition energies to the ionization energy.
elliotyang
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An element has an ionization energy of 1.66 × 10-18 J. The three longest wavelengths in its absorption spectrum are 253.7 nm, 185.0 nm and 158.5 nm.

Construct an energy-level diagram for this element.




Homework Equations



E=hf=hc/lamda

The Attempt at a Solution


ionisation energy is the energy required to remove 1 mol of electron from 1 mol of gaseous atom or ion. So the energy different between the two states is between n=? and n=infinity right? i cannot calculate the exact value using rydberg equation because i do not know the element, so cannot plug in the value of the charge in nucleus.
longest wavelengths indicates smallest energy.
when n is increasing, the difference between energy level would be smaller.
so i suppose these three wavelengths are emitted due to the energy difference between ninfinity-ninifinity-1,ninfinity-ninifinity-2, ninfinity-ninifinity-3

so how should i proceed after this?
after doing all these, i still cannot construct energy diagram
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wavelengths probably correspond to orbital transitions of an electron that does not get ionized, so your energy diagram is just showing the relative spacing of the different transitions. You're supposed to recognize that an orbital transition is lower energy than an ionization energy, so that tells you which side of the diagram they go on. Using your equation E=\frac{hc}{\lambda}, you discover that transitions of longer wavelength have lower energy. You can actually calculate this transition energy using the equation.

Once you have the energy of each transition and the ionization energy you can construct a simple diagram that shows the relative spacing of these transitions.

It's true that you can consider n going to infinity before ionization, but also remember that the relative spacing between the transitions is getting infinitely small in that limit. So just call the ionization energy the limit and find the relative spacings of the energy levels.

I hope this helps.
 
my answer is:
E=hc/λ so E= 6.63e-34 x 3.0e8 /λ = 1.989e-25/λ
Eorbital1-Eorbital0=7.84e-19 J
Eorbital2-Eorbital0=1.08e-18 J
Eorbital3-Eorbital0=1.25e-18 J

Eionisation= 1.66 × 10-18J... we make this zero and compare how much energy it would take to get an electron to this energy
Eorbital1 - Eionisation=7.839968466693e-19-1.66e-18=-8.76e-19 J
Eorbital2- Eionisation=1.075135135135e-18-1.66e-18=-5.85e-19 J
Eorbital3- Eionisation=1.2548895899e-18-1.66e-18=-4.05e-19 J

see final answer in attached picture
answerQ4.jpg
 
Please remember not to give out answers to homework, it's against our rules, although this thread being 5 years old, I doubt that they are still waiting. ;)
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top