Energy levels and the Aufbau Principle

weinus
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The energy levels of the hydrogen atom are given by En=-me4/(32\pi2\epsilonohbarn2, and are independant of the orbital angular momentum quantum number l, yet the Aufbau principle clealry implies that the energies of s, p, and d orbitals are different. Explain this apparent paradox and provide an example of experimental evidence that supports your conclusion.

I feel like I'm on the right track if I go about it from a shielding/penetration standpoint. But I could use the additional help! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are certain approximations - things you neglected - that a more careful treatment will not neglect. Consider: the electron is actually a relativistic particle, yet you used the nonrelatavistic schrodinger equation to derive those energy levels.

Look up the fine structure of the hydrogen atom.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top