Energy loss, stopping power equation,

AI Thread Summary
To estimate the energy loss of electrons before reaching a detector, the stopping power equation, defined as -dE/dx, must be integrated over the total distance. The correct formulation for energy loss is Energy loss = ∫(-dE/dx)dx, which requires specifying the variable of integration. The stopping power is influenced by the particle's energy and the medium it traverses, necessitating a specific model for accurate calculations. Clarification on integrating the stopping power helps confirm that the change in energy can be derived from the differential equation. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
m3h
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to estimate the energy loss of electrons before they reach a detector, but I am unsure how to do it. I think I am supposed to integrate the stopping power function over the total distance but I can't solve the equation...

Homework Equations



Stopping power=-dE/dx

Energy loss=∫-dE/dx (I think)

The Attempt at a Solution



Is the solution - e*x?

Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
m3h said:
Stopping power=-dE/dx

Energy loss=∫-dE/dx (I think)
That is the stopping power, but for the energy loss, you've forgotten to write dx, to show what variable you are integrating over. And about the solution, the stopping power will depend on the energy of the particle, and the medium its going through, etc, so you'll need to use a particular model to find a solution. This might be useful: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stopping_power_(particle_radiation )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes. that's the article I first looked at, specifically "The deposited energy can be obtained by integrating the stopping power over the entire path length of the ion when it moves in the solid."

When you said I needed to add dx, did you mean I should write ∫(dE/dx)dx? Doesn't dx disappear then?

Shouldn't it be enough to solve the diff equation above?
 
m3h said:
When you said I needed to add dx, did you mean I should write ∫(dE/dx)dx? Doesn't dx disappear then?

Shouldn't it be enough to solve the diff equation above?

Yes, you should write it like that. The idea is that you know something about dE/dx, so then you integrate it to get the change in energy.
And you're right that you could make the dx disappear, which just tells us that the change in energy is equal to the change in energy (as we would expect).
 
Ok, thank you. I think I know what to do now.

Thanks for the help!
 
yep, glad if I've helped a bit
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top