Energy-momentum tensor for electromagnetism

nikhilb1997
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Derive
Tμν=FμλFνλ-1/4ημνFλθFλθ
From
\mathcal{L}=1/4F_{μν}F^{μν}+A_μJ^μ

Homework Equations



Above

3. The Attempt at a Solution
The first term of the given equation and the second term of the equation to prove are i believe the same.i know, Jμ=\partial_νF^{μν}
But I need an explanation for the equivalence of the remaining term.
Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. In the absence of gravity T follows from L from the Noether theorem and the Belinfante symmetrization procedure.

2. In the presence of gravity T follows from L directly (even without the coupling to charged scalar matter).

Both parts are (advanced) textbook stuff in either of the 3 subjects: classical electrodynamics or classical/quantum field theory (1.), general relativity (2.)

Was this helpful for you ? Either 1. or 2. should give you a starting point.
 
dextercioby said:
1. In the absence of gravity T follows from L from the Noether theorem and the Belinfante symmetrization procedure.

2. In the presence of gravity T follows from L directly (even without the coupling to charged scalar matter).

Both parts are (advanced) textbook stuff in either of the 3 subjects: classical electrodynamics or classical/quantum field theory (1.), general relativity (2.)

Was this helpful for you ? Either 1. or 2. should give you a starting point.
Thanks but can you suggest a book or something where i can understand this better, a good explanatory text perhaps.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top