I Energy needed to launch a spaceship into Space

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the energy required to launch a spaceship with a mass of 4000 kg to a height of 100 km above a planet with a mass of 6.42*10^23 kg and a radius of 3.39*10^6 m. The gravitational constant is given as G = 6.67*10^-11. The spaceship is assumed to have zero velocity upon reaching the height of 100 km. Participants suggest calculating the potential energy needed for this ascent and clarify the importance of showing work in homework-related queries. The thread concludes with a reminder to post in the appropriate forum for schoolwork assistance.
IsakVern
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A given planet has a mass, M = 6.42*10^23 kg,
and radius, R = 3.39 * 10^6 m.

The gravitational konstant is G = 6.67*10^-11

A spaceship with mass m = 4000 kg is launched from the planets surface.

How much energy is needed to send the spaceship to a height h = 100 km above the planets surface?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Isak:

There are several ways to approach this problem. One way is to calculate the potential energy of the spaceship at the height of 100 km. That is the amount of energy that has to be added to get the spaceship to that height.

First, the problem statement is a bit unclear. What is the assumed state of the spaceship when it reaches a height of 100 km. Here are two possibilities:
a) the spaceship is in orbit around the planet.
b) the spaceship has zero velocity and will begin its fall back to earth.​

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Buzz
 
The assumed state of the spaceship is that it has zero velocity when it reaches 100 km.
 
IsakVern said:
The assumed state of the spaceship is that it has zero velocity when it reaches 100 km.
Hi Isak:

In that case I suggest you calculate the potential energy. You might find the following of some use. See the formula in the second box.
You may find the minus sign puzzling. If so, see what your textbook says about potential energy.

Regards,
Buzz
 
IsakVern said:
A given planet has a mass, M = 6.42*10^23 kg,
and radius, R = 3.39 * 10^6 m.

The gravitational konstant is G = 6.67*10^-11

A spaceship with mass m = 4000 kg is launched from the planets surface.

How much energy is needed to send the spaceship to a height h = 100 km above the planets surface?
Thread is locked.

@IsakVern -- All schoolwork problems go in the Homework Help forums, and you are required to show your work before we can offer tutorial help. Please re-post in the Homework Help, Introductory Physics forum, and fill out the Homework Help Template you are provided there. This includes sections on the Relevant Equations and your Attempt at a Solution.

@Buzz Bloom -- Please do not reply to misplaced schoolwork questions, especially when the OP shows zero effort in their post. Please click the Report link on their post instead, and ask the Mentors to deal with the post. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top