Energy of a magnet/iron system (eg. gauss rifle)

Wxfsa
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I want to calculate the energy of a system of iron pieces and a magnet on an axis. The configuration can be thought to be like this: http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/wiredscience/2011/12/drawingskey1.jpg

Homework Equations


dE = 1/2B^2/µdv

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried very hard to find a source which explain the calculations of magnet+iron systems but I really couldn't find anything useful. I want to learn to calculate the change in potential energy between the two systems shown in the image above (and possibly more complicated configurations)
I can imagine that the magnetic field wants to go through the iron, making the field stronger when iron is closer to the magnet but i can not even begin to calculate how much.
This may or may not be a problem that can be solved by hand (I am posting this here because I thought this was a homework type question) Reasonable assumptions, and idealizations probably must be made. Shapes of the magnets and iron can be changed for easier calculations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calculating the potential energy of magnets and magnetic things is messy - you can do a finite element analysis, but this is nothing you want to do just for a toy.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top