Energy of simple harmonic oscillator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the energy of a simple harmonic oscillator, where a particle moves along the x-axis under a force proportional to -kx. The kinetic energy (K) is expressed as (1/2)m*w^2*A^2*cos^2(wt + τ), and the potential energy (P) is (1/2)k*A^2*sin^2(wt + τ). Initially, the total energy calculation did not yield a constant value, prompting a reevaluation of the equations. By recognizing that both K and P share a common factor and applying the trigonometric identity cos^2(x) + sin^2(x) = 1, it is confirmed that the total energy remains constant. This realization underscores the importance of correctly applying mathematical identities in physics problems.
clemente
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle moves along x-axis subject to a force toward the origin proportional to -kx. Find kinetic (K) and potential (P) energy as functions of time t, and show that total energy is contant.

Homework Equations



K = (1/2)m*v^2
P = (1/2)k*x^2
E = K+P

x = Asin(wt + \tau)

v = dx/dt = wA(cos(wt + \tau)

The Attempt at a Solution



K = (1/2)m*v^2 = (1/2)m*w^2A^2(cos^2(wt + \tau)

P = (1/2)k*x^2 = (1/2)k*A^2(sin^2(wt + \tau))

But when I add these to get the total energy, the terms with t do not cancel, and so the total energy is not constant. I can only imagine then that I've done something wrong in the above, very basic steps. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Another equation that comes in handy is w^2 = k/m. Rearranging this you get k = m*w^2 which can be substituted into the first equation, to get K = (1/2)m*v^2 = (1/2)k*A^2(cos^2(wt + \tau )).

When adding K+P, the (1/2)k*A^2 (which is present in both terms) can now be taken as a common factor and using the trigonometric identity cos^2(x) + sin^2(x) = 1 shows the energy is constant.
 
Of course, that seems so obvious now! Thank you very much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top