Energy principle and circular/ellipse orbits

AI Thread Summary
To move an object from a circular orbit with radius R_1 to an elliptical orbit with aphelion radius R_2, the energy principle is applicable. The total specific mechanical energy of an orbit is inversely proportional to the size of its major axis, calculated as ξ = -μ/(2a). The energy change required can be determined by the difference between the total energy of the elliptical orbit and that of the circular orbit. Assuming the perihelion radius of the new orbit is equal to R_1 is a valid approach when the semi-major axis is not provided. Understanding these energy dynamics is crucial for accurate orbital mechanics calculations.
Uniquebum
Messages
53
Reaction score
1
Question is as follows:
How much energy do i need when i move an object with a mass M from a circular orbit with a radius of R_1 to an ellipse orbit with aphelion radius of R_2.

I'm assuming energy principle is the way to go here but it leads to a question i'd like someone to help me out with.

Do i need to assume the perihelion radius of the new orbit (aphelion radius R_2) is the circular orbit's radius R_1?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uniquebum said:
Question is as follows:
How much energy do i need when i move an object with a mass M from a circular orbit with a radius of R_1 to an ellipse orbit with aphelion radius of R_2.

I'm assuming energy principle is the way to go here but it leads to a question i'd like someone to help me out with.

Do i need to assume the perihelion radius of the new orbit (aphelion radius R_2) is the circular orbit's radius R_1?

Thanks in advance.

You can assume anything you like; The answer you get will depend upon your assumptions :smile:

The Total Specific Mechanical Energy, \xi, of an orbit is inversely proportional to the size of its major axis. Thus \xi = -\frac{\mu}{2 a} . The length of the major axis, in turn, is the sum of the perihelion and aphelion distances. Specific Mechanical Energy is the energy per unit mass; Multiply by mass of the orbiting object to get the energy.

attachment.php?attachmentid=43440&stc=1&d=1328281671.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 593
Yea, i presumed as much. To get the energy change needed i'd have to go

\Delta E = -\frac{GMm}{2a} - \frac{1}{2}mv_1^2 + \frac{GMm}{R_1}

So basically ellipse orbit total energy minus circular orbit total energy. Since i wasn't given the semi-major axis but only the aphelion radius of the ellipse orbit, i would think i'd need to assume the perihelion radius is the R_1. Either way, i think I'm going with this.
Whatever the case, thanks for the reply!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top