I Energy released calculation using Binding energy and mass defect

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the energy released in a nuclear reaction using binding energy (BE) and mass defect. The equation presented shows the relationship between reactants and products, emphasizing the need to account for all particles, including neutrons. The energy released is derived from the difference in binding energy of the products and reactants, leading to a formula that includes a term for the neutrons. A discrepancy arises when considering mass loss, highlighting the importance of including all components in the calculations. The correct approach must incorporate the neutrons to accurately reflect the energy released in the reaction.
phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
TL;DR
I notice a discrepancy in calculating the energy released when using binding energy and mass defect.
Consider the equation
X (200, 50) + n (1, 0) -> Y (120, 30) + Z (70, 20) + 11 n(1, 0)

Let p be the mass of a proton, n be the mass of a neutron.
BE(X) = [50p + 150n - M(X)] c^2
BE(Y) = [30p + 90n - M(Y)] c^2
BE(Z) = [20p + 50n - M(Z)]c^2

The energy released when using BE (products) - BE (reactants) is thus: [M(X) - M(Y) - M(Z) - 10n] c^2
On the other hand, the mass released using [Mass (reactants) - Mass (products)]c^2 = [M(X) - M(Y) - M(Z)] c^2

There is a difference of 10n * c^2. Which is the correct calculation and why is the other wrong? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How can you leave out the neutrons?
 
Hi everyone, I am doing a final project on the title " fundamentals of neutrino physics". I wanted to raise some issues with neutrino which makes it the possible way to the physics beyond standard model. I am myself doing some research on these topics but at some points the math bugs me out. Anyway, i have some questions which answers themselves confounded me due to the complicated math. Some pf them are: 1. Why wouldn't there be a mirror image of a neutrino? Is it because they are...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K