Engaging Textbooks: Making Learning Interesting for Kids

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the need for educational materials, particularly textbooks, to align more closely with students' interests, such as popular culture icons like Batman and Spider-Man, to enhance engagement in subjects like physics. Participants express that many current educational problems are too dry and fail to capture students' attention. The conversation touches on the challenge of balancing standardized curriculum requirements with the desire to make learning relevant and interesting. Examples like cell phones illustrate the difficulty of integrating real-world applications into physics education without oversimplifying or complicating the concepts. There is a call for incorporating the science of learning into teacher training to move beyond subjective teaching methods. Additionally, several book recommendations are shared, including "Physics of the Superheroes," which aims to make physics more relatable and engaging.
Messages
19,773
Reaction score
10,726
What a great teaching opportunity! Why aren't more textbooks gears towards kids actual interests. Most problems are so dry. Include batman or Spider-Man and kids may actually be interested!
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    30.1 KB · Views: 665
Science news on Phys.org
Haha, true say!
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
What a great teaching opportunity! Why aren't more textbooks gears towards kids actual interests. Most problems are so dry. Include batman or Spider-Man and kids may actually be interested!

Kidding aside, this issue consistently generates huge amounts of discussion- presenting introductory physics to biology students is but one example- http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/article/66/7/10.1063/PT.3.2046

There are many books out there as well, for example https://www.amazon.com/dp/1592405088/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Reasonable people can disagree about how to incorporate 'actual interests' (and what that even means) into the introductory physics curriculum. On one hand, we are supposed to tailor the material to each student's abilities and interests; on the other, we have to teach a standardized content.

A good example is the cell phone- everyone has one, but how to discuss it within the framework of an introductory physics class? Either the reality of the device is discussed, which is too complex, or the abstracted principles are discussed, which removes the relevance.

Finally, until the 'science of learning' is formally incorporated into professional training, we will continue to generate 'faith-based' teachers who develop a teaching practice according to what they think is most effective.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Last edited by a moderator:
I have mixed feelings about this sort of thing. For some people, it makes physics interesting. For other people, it just seems to reinforce the idea that physics isn't useful in "real life." (As in, why should I care about physics if it only let's me solve contrived situations in a made-up world?)
 
Nice idea of actually creating interest in kids.
 
Back
Top