Enthelpic Excess Function - Phase Separation in Regular solutions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phase separation in regular solutions as described by the enthalpic excess function. It is established that for \(\beta > +2\), two minima indicate phase separation driven by unfavorable enthalpic interactions. The disagreement arises regarding the miscibility of components at \(\beta = 2.5\) and \(\beta = 3\), where the spontaneous mixing condition \(\Delta_{mix} G/nRT < 0\) is debated. The participants question the interpretation of phase behavior at maxima and minima, specifically whether solutions are miscible at maxima despite positive \(\Delta_{mix} G/nRT\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of phase separation and enthalpic interactions in solutions
  • Familiarity with the Gibbs free energy equation and its implications for mixing
  • Knowledge of regular solution theory and its graphical representations
  • Basic concepts of thermodynamics related to spontaneity and miscibility
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Gibbs free energy equation on phase behavior in solutions
  • Study the concept of enthalpic excess functions in regular solutions
  • Examine phase diagrams and their interpretations in the context of chemical interactions
  • Explore the conditions for miscibility and phase separation in various chemical systems
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, chemical engineers, and students studying thermodynamics and phase behavior in solutions will benefit from this discussion.

elemis
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
My professor, in his handout (picture below), says the following about this diagram :

For \beta&gt;+2 there are two minima and phase separation occurs driven
by unfavourable enthalpic interactions.

I disagree with him partly. For \Delta_{mix} G/nRT&lt;0 mixing is spontaneous and hence there solutions would be miscible. Hence at \beta=2.5 should we not expect the components to be fully miscible. ?

Following on from this logic; for \beta=3 the components are only miscible for \Delta_{mix} G/nRT&lt;0 so the maxima represents a phase separation between the two components.

Who is correct ?

Additionally,the webpage below indicates that at the maxima there is one phase whilst at the minima there are two. Does this mean at the maxima the solutions are miscible ? If so, how can this be true given that \Delta_{mix} G/nRT&lt;0 is positive and hence mixing is unfavourable ?

http://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/~chdms/Teaching/Chemical_Interactions/page_17.htm


UXgcikZ.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Any ideas ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K