Entropy and organized systems

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TheusMX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy Termodynamics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between entropy and organized systems, particularly in biological contexts. It establishes that while the entropy of the universe increases, localized decreases in entropy, such as those found in life forms, are possible due to energy dissipation from sources like the Sun. The concept of effective complexity, as defined by Murray Gell-Mann and Seth Lloyd, is introduced as a measure of non-random information in systems, highlighting the challenges in defining complexity. The conversation emphasizes that organized systems can exist within the broader framework of increasing entropy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics and the second law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with the concept of entropy in physical systems
  • Knowledge of energy dissipation and its role in biological systems
  • Awareness of complexity measures, particularly effective complexity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the second law of thermodynamics and its implications for biological systems
  • Explore the concept of effective complexity as defined by Murray Gell-Mann and Seth Lloyd
  • Investigate energy dissipation structures and their role in maintaining organized systems
  • Examine various measures of complexity and their applications in different scientific fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, biology, and complexity science, as well as anyone interested in the interplay between entropy and organized systems.

TheusMX
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
If the entropy of the universe always increases, how is it possible for organized systems like life to exist? Shouldn't the natural tendency always be toward disorder and chaos? I'm confused about how this law applies to biological systems.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: binis
Science news on Phys.org
Dissipation structure is an answer. In order the Earth including the lives evloves, the Sun provides energy. Entropy of the system decrease thanks to energy dissipation, which ends with entropy increase in the total system.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheusMX, binis and russ_watters
TheusMX said:
I'm confused about how this law applies to biological systems.
The same as for any other system.

How do you think ice crystals form?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheusMX and binis
TheusMX said:
If the entropy of the universe always increases, how is it possible for organized systems like life to exist? Shouldn't the natural tendency always be toward disorder and chaos? I'm confused about how this law applies to biological systems.
The answer is illustrated by the following pictures:
setting-time-aright-16-728.jpg
MinutePhysics_MTFY0H4EZx4_2m38s_920px.png
Organized systems correspond to states with high complexity, where entropy is neither too big nor too small. See also the Appendix in my https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.08341
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheusMX and binis
The local entropy per unit mass varies with spatial position in the universe. If the entropy decreases in one region, the entropy in the rest of the universe must increase by a greater amount.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheusMX and binis
Maybe this video will help:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheusMX, binis and Demystifier
Demystifier said:
The answer is illustrated by the following pictures:
View attachment 357476
How are you measuring complexity?

The claim that a fully mixed container of milk and Coke has lower complexity than a partially mixed container? Presumably because you consider "fully mixed" to be a simple to describe macro-state despite requiring a vast quantity of information to completely describe a particular microstate. I am pretty sure that there is a broken definition lurking in there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheusMX, Dale and binis
jbriggs444 said:
How are you measuring complexity?

The claim that a fully mixed container of milk and Coke has lower complexity than a partially mixed container? Presumably because you consider "fully mixed" to be a simple to describe macro-state despite requiring a vast quantity of information to completely describe a particular microstate. I am pretty sure that there is a broken definition lurking in there.
Complexity is hard to define precisely. For some approaches see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Measures_of_complexity
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheusMX and binis
Demystifier said:
Complexity is hard to define precisely. For some approaches see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Measures_of_complexity
And there it is. Indeed, one possible definition is broken.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_complexity said:
Effective complexity is a measure of complexity defined in a 1996 paper by Murray Gell-Mann and Seth Lloyd that attempts to measure the amount of non-random information in a system.[1][2] It has been criticised as being dependent on the subjective decisions made as to which parts of the information in the system are to be discounted as random.[3]
[emphasis mine]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheusMX

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
926
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K