thenthanable
- 5
- 0
limx→01/(x2-1)=-1
0<|x|<δ and |((1/(x2-1)) +1)<ε
Working on the second equation, I eventually got
|x|< (ε|x-1||x+1|)0.5
Suppose I restrict |x|<1
-1<x<1,
then
0<x+1<2 → |x+1|<2
-2<x-1<0 → 0<1-x<2 → |1-x|=|x-1|<2 (Is this step correct? In one of the textbooks, it says that we must always have x>0 which is important to conclude that for example, |x-1|<2 in the context of this question. Unfortunately, I don't see why we must conclude that x>0 because doesn't the modulus get rid of all negative values?)
So my choice for δ works out to be δ=min{1,2(ε)0.5}
However when I work backwards the problem arises.
Suppose I choose δ=1 → 2(ε)0.5 > 1 → ε>0.25
When I draw the graph, my δ-range of x=0 starts from the asymptote at x=-1 to the other asymptote x=1, and if this is the case, doesn't that mean the range ε about f(x)=-1 is infinite?
0<|x|<δ and |((1/(x2-1)) +1)<ε
Working on the second equation, I eventually got
|x|< (ε|x-1||x+1|)0.5
Suppose I restrict |x|<1
-1<x<1,
then
0<x+1<2 → |x+1|<2
-2<x-1<0 → 0<1-x<2 → |1-x|=|x-1|<2 (Is this step correct? In one of the textbooks, it says that we must always have x>0 which is important to conclude that for example, |x-1|<2 in the context of this question. Unfortunately, I don't see why we must conclude that x>0 because doesn't the modulus get rid of all negative values?)
So my choice for δ works out to be δ=min{1,2(ε)0.5}
However when I work backwards the problem arises.
Suppose I choose δ=1 → 2(ε)0.5 > 1 → ε>0.25
When I draw the graph, my δ-range of x=0 starts from the asymptote at x=-1 to the other asymptote x=1, and if this is the case, doesn't that mean the range ε about f(x)=-1 is infinite?