How Do Equal and Opposite Torques Work with Different Moment Arms?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BrainSalad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torques
AI Thread Summary
Angular momentum is conserved, requiring that the change in angular momentum of one object is canceled by the change in the other object exerting torque. Equal and opposite torques arise from the interaction of two objects, which also exert equal contact forces according to Newton's third law. When considering moment arms, if one object's moment arm is larger, it complicates the relationship, as equal torques imply equal moment arms when forces are equal. However, angular momentum applies to both rotating and non-rotating objects, necessitating the specification of a point for accurate calculations. Ultimately, equal but opposite torques must be computed around the same point to maintain consistency in the analysis.
BrainSalad
Messages
53
Reaction score
1
Angular momentum is conserved, which means that the change in angular momentum of object A must be exactly canceled by the change in angular momentum of the object exerting a torque on object A. So, the objects, A and B, exert equal and opposite torques on each other. But, the contact forces between the objects must also be equal (Newton's 3rd). Torque= F x r, so what if the moment arm (r) of object A is larger than object B? If torques are equal and forces are equal, moment arms must also be equal, but this is certainly not always the case. What's going on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"angular momentum" encompasses more than just the rotation of rigid objects around their centers of mass. A moving, non-rotating object also has angular momentum around any specified point. Before you can even have a well-defined angular momentum, you have to specify that point.

Say you have specified that point and you have two objects that are interacting with a contact force -- they bump into each other. By Newton's third law, the forces are equal and opposite [as you have understood]. By the definition of angular momentum, the moment arms are equal -- it is a contact force so both forces act at the same point and both moment arms originate at the same point. It follows that the two torques are equal and opposite.

If you have a force-at-a-distance, things are a little messier, but it works out that the cross product of force times moment arm is still equal and opposite.
 
BrainSalad said:
If torques are equal and forces are equal, moment arms must also be equal, but this is certainly not always the case.
The equal but opposite torques must be both computed around the same point.
 
Thanks to both of you, that clears things up. Can't wait to learn this stuff formally.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top