Equating mass and charge ratio of cathode rays

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equation q/m = (2V)/(B^2r^2). The user begins by equating electric and magnetic forces, leading to the expression v = E/B. They then relate kinetic energy to charge and potential, resulting in the equation q/m = E^2/(2VB^2). The user expresses confusion about their method and seeks clarification. They also mention that electrons deflect in a circular path, using centripetal force to derive v = Bqr/m. By substituting this expression into the kinetic energy equation, they ultimately confirm that their calculations align with the desired result, indicating a successful approach to the problem.
redruM
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
hi:smile:

i was approached by this problem,

prove q/m = (2V)/(B^2r^2) [2V over B-squared r-squared]

so far i have,

F[electric] = qE

F[magnetic] = Qvb

F[electric] = F[magnetic]

therefore, v = E/B

-----
now i am a bit confused/wrong
-----

E[kinetic] = (mv^2)/2

therefore, q x V = (mv^2)/2

therefore, q/m = E^2/(2VB^2)

jus by looking at the result, i have to get E= 2V/r.

any insights will be greatly appreciated...
if my method even correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F[magnetic] = qvB

Elecrons will be deflected in a circular path, so

F[centripital] = mv^2/r

Equate these, and get v = Bqr/m

Electrons accelerate through a potential, so

E[kinetic] = mv^2/2 = qV

Substitute v = Bqr/m into this, and solve for q/m.
 
thanks a lot..

works out perfectly
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...

Similar threads

Back
Top