Equating Truth Table Expressions: A NAND Solution

hholzer
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Wasn't sure of where the most appropriate place would be for this post.

If you have a truth table, say for inclusive OR, then you get a
sums-of-products expression:

(A * B^c) + (A^c * B) + (A * B)

From this, how could I arrive at the following:

A + B = ((A + B)^c)^c = (A^c * B^c)^c
Then, we can say A + B is equivalent to:
(A NAND A) NAND (B NAND B)

Hence, we can write inclusive OR in terms of
three NANDS. In short: how can I equate
(A * B^c) + (A^c * B) + (A * B) to
(A^c * B^c)^c

I've played around with it a bit but I'm not
hitting upon anything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hholzer said:
If you have a truth table, say for inclusive OR, then you get a
sums-of-products expression:

(A * B^c) + (A^c * B) + (A * B)

No, a truth table is a table, not a logical expression. The values in a truth table are "True" or "False" ( 0 or 1 if you use that notation).

In short: how can I equate
(A * B^c) + (A^c * B) + (A * B) to
(A^c * B^c)^c

I think what you want to do is show the equivalence of A + B with (A^c*B^c)^c.

If you want to use truth tables, you would have to write a truth table for those two expressions showing all possible cases of the truth or falsity of A and B.

If you want to use the rules for manipulating logical variables, begin with the rule that (P*Q)^c = P^c + Q^c. Apply that rule to (A^c*B^c)^c
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top