Equation check: Dimensional analysis.

AI Thread Summary
The equation D = 17.87 √[3]{d/f²} is intended to describe the relationship between resonant frequencies in a spherical cavity but raises concerns regarding dimensional consistency. The left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS) dimensions do not match, particularly due to the frequency term introducing an incorrect dimension of T²/³. A proposed correction includes adding a speed of sound term, suggesting the equation should be D = 17.87 √[3]{dC²/f²}. While there is speculation about the author's assumptions regarding units, the discussion indicates that the original equation may not be ideally expressed but could still be valid under specific conditions. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of dimensional analysis in verifying the accuracy of physical equations.
Beer-monster
Messages
285
Reaction score
0
I came across this equation, said to describe the relation between the resonant frequencies of air in a spherical cavity open at the top.

D = 17.87 \sqrt[3]{\frac{d}{f^{2}}}

Where D is the sphere diameter, d is the diameter of a small circular cavity at the top of the sphere and f is the resonant frequency.

Is it me or is this equation wrong?

The dimensions do not seem to check out. The frequency term introduces a dimension of T^{2/3} to the RHS which is not balanced on the LHS.

I would guess that a term with units of speed squared should be added to the numerator inside the cube-root. That would add dimensions of L^{2/3} T^{-2/3}. I would also suspect that this speed of be the speed of sound in the air (C).

i.e. I think the equation should be:

D = 17.87 \sqrt[3]{\frac{dC^{2}}{f^{2}}}

Can anyone tell me if I'm right?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your argument makes sense, but it is possible that the author presumed/specified certain units to be used and has incorporated a standard value for the speed of sound in air, based on that assumption of units, into the constant.
 
Thanks for the reply.

No mention of different units that I can see. The author also uses a similar formula for a cavity with a neck and includes a speed of sound term.

To be completely frank, I'm checking a wikipedia article. An error is therefore, not completely unexpected. Though I lack the confidence to be 100% confident in my argument.
 
Beer-monster said:
No mention of different units that I can see.
I didn't say different units, I said specific units. The article specifies metres, and the author may have felt it reasonable to assume that frequency is in cycles/sec. The next equation, where the speed of sound does appear, doesn't have a magic constant. This leads me to suspect the first equation is correct, just not ideally expressed.
I notice that if you write L=d and C=340m/s in the second equation you get something close to the first.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top