Equation: work done by friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the work done by friction and another force, vector F, in a physics context. It requires consideration of the signs associated with work and the definitions of the forces involved, particularly in relation to displacement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the correctness of the expressions for work done by friction and vector F, with some questioning the definitions of angles and the direction of forces. There is an exploration of how the normal force is affected by the applied force F.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the attempts made. Some guidance has been offered regarding the signs of work done by forces, and there is recognition of the importance of understanding the relationship between the forces and displacement.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential impact of a missing figure on the interpretation of the angle θ and the direction of force F. There is also mention of the need to clarify whether the question is asking for the magnitude of work or the signed value.

mandy9008
Messages
127
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


How much work is done by the friction force and by vector F ? (Don't forget the signs.) (Use mu_k for µk, q for θ, and m, g, x, and F as appropriate.)
(a.) work done by friction
(b.) work done by vector F


The Attempt at a Solution



a. mu_k(mg-Fsinq)x
b. Fxcosq
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Those look correct.
 
a is incorrect
 
a is correct.. as long as x is displacement
 
it is, and it keeps telling me that it is incorrect.
 
mandy9008 said:
it is, and it keeps telling me that it is incorrect.

Is there a figure for this? The answer sort of depends on how θ is defined with respect to F and the horizontal.

(i) First I should ask, is θ actually the angle between the horizontal and F, or is it defined differently?

(ii) Does F point in a somewhat downwards direction or in a somewhat upwards direction?

mandy9008,

Ask yourself this to make sure that your answer makes sense. You have given your answer as

mu_k(mg-Fsinq)x

That implies that the normal reactive force is mg-Fsinq. Which implies that the figure is drawn such that as the magnitude of F gets bigger, the normal force becomes smaller (indicating that F has a somewhat upward direction). Does this make sense according to the figure (if there was a figure)? If the figure is drawn such that as F gets larger so does the normal force, how would you modify your equation to express this?
 
Oh, I think I see what's going on. Silly us. Don't feel bad, I missed it too. :redface: The hint is given in the problem statement. Don't forget the signs!

Work done by a force is positive if the force vector component is parallel (same direction) to the displacement vector. But the work done by a force is negative if anti-parallel (opposite direction). (That's because if they are in opposite directions, the positive work is really done to the force, not by the force.)

Work done by friction is pretty much always going to be such that the frictional force is in the opposite direction as the displacement vector. Which means the work done by friction is going to be... :wink:

mandy9008, Do you see what needs to be changed in your mu_k(mg-Fsinq)x equation now?
 
its just -ve.. i thought they were asking for the magnitude.. either way on an exam a question like this would be on a mc so you would see the signs =]

you've got nothing to worry about.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K