Equations of motion for a rotational system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Laplace transformed equations of motion for a rotational system, with specific confusion regarding the absence of a defined angle for rotation J2, suggesting it may not have linearly independent motion. The fourth equation of motion is particularly challenging, as the relationship between the torque and the terms is unclear. A proposed solution involves disregarding the defined angles and instead using absolute rotations (phi1, phi2) for each body to simplify the equations. This approach aims to clarify the relationships and facilitate the derivation of the original equations in terms of the defined angles. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the need for a clearer understanding of the rotational dynamics involved.
theone
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://postimg.org/image/9fw7awqov/
The question is to write the Laplace transformed equations of motion for the system

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I am confused about a couple of things: why is an angle is not defined for the rotation of J2. Does it means J2 does not have linearly independent motion?And the fourth equation of motion (for the second J=0), I can understand the theta 4 term being due to the torques associated with it's motion but I don't get the other term.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I would suggest that you start by ignoring the thetas as defined, and simply define absolute rotations, phi1, phi2, etc. for each body. Then write the equations of motion. At that point, you will be in a better position to back into the equations you gave previously in terms of theta1, theta2, etc.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top