Equations of Motion & Forces of a Motorcycle Suspension

AI Thread Summary
A motorcycle suspension model is being developed to analyze how road bump forces affect the bike. The user has created a free body diagram and derived several equations of motion but is struggling to solve for forces and velocities at specific points. They seek guidance on integrating these equations, particularly in relation to a specific initial condition involving a 2-inch bump and a ramp-up speed of 4 inches per second. The discussion highlights the complexity of damping behavior and the need to simplify the model without incorporating gas dampers. Suggestions for proceeding with the integration and force calculations are requested.
baranij
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Spring Mass Damper Solution of a Motorcycle Suspension

I am trying to create a model of a motorcycle suspension to figure how road bump forces get transferred to the bike.
I have created a free body diagram of the system and also attached a pdf. If you need the original powerpoint in case there are mistakes, just let me know and I can email it since its not one of the accepted formats on this forum.

Wheel%20Loads%20Spring%20Mass%20Diagram%20OF%20Suspension.jpg


The following are the equations of motion that I derived from my Free Body diagram. Since its been a few years since college, I am at a loss as how to proceede to solve for forces and velocities at different points in the diagram. I am looking for equations of force at points b, d and e a function of input velocity and displacement.

Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

1. \sum FORCES_{a} = F_{R} + (b-a)K_{W} + (\dot{b}-\dot{a})C_{W} = 0

2. \sum FORCES_{b} = F_{b} - \ddot{b}M_{W} + (a-b)K_{W} + (\dot{a}-\dot{b})C_{W} = 0


3a. \sum FORCES_{c} = F_{b} + F_{c} + F_{d} = 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ and \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ F_{c} = -\ddot{e}M_{X}

3b. \sum MOMENTS_{c} = (cd)F_{d} - (bc)F_{b} = 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ so \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ F_{d} = \frac{bc}{cd}F_{b} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ and \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ F_{b} = \frac{cd}{bc}F_{d}


4. \sum FORCES_{d} = F_{d} + (e-d)K_{X} + (\dot{e}-\dot{d})C_{X} = 0

5. \sum FORCES_{e} = -\ddot{e}M_{X} - eK_{Y} + (d-e)K_{X} + (\dot{d}-\dot{e})C_{X} + F_{c}= 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ and \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ F_{c} = -F_{b}-F_{d}

Motion relationship of points b, c, and / d on the lever.
b = \left(\frac{\ \overline{bc}\ }{\ \overline{cd}\ }+1\right) c \ - \ \frac{\ \overline{bc}\ }{\ \overline{cd}\ }d \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ and \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ e = c \ \ \ \ \ point \ \ c \ \ and \ point \ \ e \ \ are \ linked \ and \ move \ the \ same \ amount.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I managed to combine equations 2 and 4 to get the following.


<br /> K_{W}a \ + \ C_{W}\dot{a} \ + \ R^{2}K_{X}e \ + \ R^{2}C_{X}\dot{e} \ = \ \left(K_{W} + R^{2}K_{X}\right)b \ \ + \ \left(C_{W} + R^{2}C_{X}\right)\dot{b} \ -\ M_{W}\ddot{b}<br />

To keep things simple, I substituted R for the lever motion ratio. R = \frac{\ \overline{cd}\ }{\ \overline{bc}\ }

Now how do I simplify it further?

Should I integrate to get forces...if yes, how do I integrate \ddot{b}
Do I get \dot{b} + C How do I get C?

From combining equations 2 and 4 & 5 I get the following.

<br /> M_{X}\ddot{e} \ + \ K_{Y}e \ - \ K_{W}a \ + \ C_{W}\dot{a} \ = M_{W}\ddot{b} \ - \ C_{W}\dot{b} \ - \ K_{W}b<br />
 
Last edited:
Hmmm, it's actually much more complicated than that and you need to integrate the force over the amount of actual suspension-travel. Damping values in the dampers will change over this travel distance as the gas compresses and the dampers increase its resistance.

There are also harmonics from the mass of the bike, wheel, spring-rates, damping that causes the overall damping-value to be completely different for a 2nd bump of the exact same size and magnitude as the 1st. This will vary as a function of time.
 
Thank you, that's some very good points. I am trying to keep this as simple as possible and don't want to model a gas damper, just a regular coil spring with a constant damping coefficient damper.

What I'm trying to figure out is the reaction to a specific initial condition...lets say a 2 inch tall bump with a ramp up speed of 4 in/sec

What is confusing me is how to integrate with respect to bump height when the integrals are with respect to Time.

ANY SUGGESTIONS OF HOW I SHOULD PROCEED?

\int s = \int^{bump}_{0} s \ dt = \frac{s^2}{2}+C_{0}

\int v = \int^{bump}_{0} \frac{ds}{dt} \ dt= s+C_{1}

\int a = \int^{bump}_{0} \frac{dv}{dt} \ dt= v+C_{2}

\int (v+C_{2}) = \int^{bump}_{0} \frac{ds}{dt} \ dt\ \ + \int^{bump}_{0} C_{2} \ dt = (s+C_{3}) +(C_{2}s+C_{4})
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top