Equilibrim Physics Problems – Solve Now!

  • Thread starter Thread starter gnarrr
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To achieve rotational equilibrium with a downward force of 40.5 N, the distance from point 'A' must be calculated using the equation T1 = T2 and F = 0. The initial attempt at solving the problem included incorrect calculations, leading to a distance of 6.18 m. It is essential to consider both clockwise and counterclockwise moments when calculating moments about the fulcrum. Proper sign conventions must be applied to ensure accurate results. The discussion emphasizes the importance of showing work and relevant equations when seeking help with physics problems.
gnarrr
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/8011/physicsproblems.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi gnarrr, welcome to PF.
Please go through the rules of the PF.
Don't post the problems alone. Show your attempts. List the relevant equations. Still if you don't get, we will help you.
 
The first one

Homework Statement



Consider the bar to have negligible mass. How far from point 'A' must a downward force of 40.5 N be applied in order to achieve rotational equilibrium.

Homework Equations


T1=T2
F=0

The Attempt at a Solution



5x9.8x2.1 + 3.5x9.8x4.3 + 40.5xd = 0
d=6.18m
 
i figured out the second one
 
First on is wrong.
If you want to take the moment about the fulcrum, you have to consider clockwise and counterclockwise moments and use proper sings.
If you want to take the moments about A, 40.5 N and 3.5 kg produce clockwise moment and the reaction due to all the forces on the fulcrum will produce the counterclockwise moment. Equate them to get d.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top