Equilibrium and Kp: Find HI Mass at 700K

  • Thread starter Thread starter MeMoses
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the mass of HI at equilibrium for the reaction H2(g) + I2(g) <-> 2HI(g) with Kp = 55.5 at 700 K. An initial setup includes 2.00 moles of H2 and 1.00 mole of I2 in a 5.00 L flask. The user initially calculates the pressure and attempts to solve for the equilibrium concentration but consistently arrives at a mass of around 250-260 g instead of the correct 240 g. Feedback indicates errors in the setup of the equilibrium expression, specifically in the numerator and denominator, and suggests using an ICE table for clarity. The discussion emphasizes that Kc can be used directly without converting to pressure due to the lack of volume change.
MeMoses
Messages
127
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The following reaction has Kp = 55.5 at 700 K:
H2(g) + I2(g) <-> 2HI(g)
You introguce 2.00 moles of H2(g) and 1.00 mole of I2(g) into a previously evacuated 5.00 L flash, and then heat the flask to 700 K. What mass of HI(g) will be present at eqilibrium?

Homework Equations



PV=nRT
Kp

The Attempt at a Solution


The pressure of 3 moles in 5L at 700K is 34.4652atm. So for every atm the reactant pressure decreases the product pressure increases the same. I get x^2 / (34.4652-x) = 55.6 => x=24.0466atm. I covert that to mol using pv=nrt and then multiply by the molecular wight of HI and get around 250 or 260 g *i forgot to wrrite it down). The answer however is 240g and every method I try I always get over by around 20 which doesn't seem right. Can you tell what I'm doing wrong? Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are trying to cut corners which yielded two mistakes - one in the nominator, one in the denominator. The one in the nominator is a simple simple omission of coefficient, the one in the denominator is an atrocity done to physics. Do it correctly, step by step. Start with the ICE table.

Note that you don't have to use pressures - there is no volume change, so Kc=Kp. Final result you will get using Kc will be the same, but you don't have to convert to p.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top