Equilibrium Constant: Valid under what conditions?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the equilibrium constant and Gibbs free energy, specifically addressing whether a reaction must occur at constant temperature (T), pressure (P), and chemical potential (m) to determine the products using the equilibrium constant. It is clarified that the condition (dG)_{T,P,m}=0 signifies equilibrium but does not dictate the path taken to reach that state. Once a reaction reaches equilibrium, the composition can be determined if T, P, and m are specified. Additionally, it is noted that the equilibrium constant (K) is temperature-dependent, and changes in temperature affect the Gibbs free energy (∆G) through the equation ∆G=∆H - T∆S, indicating that altering temperature shifts the system away from equilibrium.
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
Hello all! :smile:

I am wondering: Since we derive the equilibrium constant by minimizing the Gibbs free energy, it means that me are taking advantage of the fact that at the minimum, we have (dG)_{T,P,m}=0. Does this mean that in order to determine the products of a reaction using the equilibrium constant then the reaction must take place at constant T, P, and m?

Thanks for your time!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I know that Ka values can change at different temperatures and ∆G has a dependence on temperature based on ∆G=∆H - T∆S. So if you have ∆G = O at a certain temp and you change that temp then you are changing the (T∆S) term thereby making ∆G =/= 0. This moves the system away from equilibrium and it will then tend to the new minimum energy by the appropriate means.

EDIT: Let me say that I'm no expert by far and if you are looking for a definitive answer I'd wait for a true expert to come along. I'm wrong on plenty of things and although I think the overall answer is correct, the reasoning may be off or incomplete.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for replying Yanick :smile: I did some more thinking and research on this one. (dG)T,P,m=0 is simply a relationship between state variables AT equilibrium. It does not matter HOW they got to equilibrium. If we know that a reaction has come to equilibrium and we are somehow able to specify T, P, and m, then the composition can be determined using the equilibrium constant. You are of course correct in that K varies with T (and P and m) for exactly the above reason.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top