Equilibrium from multivariable potential energy

carllacan
Messages
272
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Three masses are disposed in a circular lane and linked with springs (resting lengths Lo). Find the potential energy and, from it, the equilibrium positions. (see image: https://www.dropbox.com/s/evqcspwlj68p5n9/2014-02-05 16.07.07.jpg )


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have no problems finding the potential energy, but I'm not sure how to find the equilibrium positions from it. Should I derive respect each coordinate separately and get three expresions that i have to equate with 0? Or do a triple partial derivative \frac{\partial V}{\partial \phi_1 \partial \phi_2 \partial \phi_3}and the equal that to 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What can you say about the potential energy function at a point of equilibrium?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
TSny said:
What can you say about the potential energy function at a point of equilibrium?

That it is a stationary point. However in this case I have three variables, so I'm not sure if it is enough with equating the derivatives to 0 or if I need to use something more advanced like Lagrange multipliers.
 
Stationary point is right. So equating each first derivative to 0 should do it.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top