Chemistry Equilibrium K Values: Problem Solving Tips

  • Thread starter Thread starter Traced
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
Understanding equilibrium constant (K) values involves recognizing their dependence on temperature and reaction rates. To solve problems without specific chemical reactions or K values, one should focus on the principles of chemical equilibrium and synthesis. A larger K indicates a reaction favoring products, while a smaller K suggests a reactant-favored equilibrium. Temperature can significantly influence K, with lower temperatures often increasing K but slowing reaction rates. Balancing these factors is crucial for effective problem-solving in equilibrium scenarios.
Traced
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
You are a chemical engineer that is responsible for synthesizing a new drug. You look at a series of potential chemical reactions that will make your drug along with their respective K values. What type of K value would you be looking for and why?
Relevant Equations
n/a
I know what K does, what can change K, and I know about the equilibrium equation. I don't know how to use that to answer this problem. I'm not given any chemical reactions or their K values. How should I start this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would you like K to be large or small?
 
You know what K is, therefore you must know what a chemical reaction is. You need to know what synthesising is. If you know that you are given a free hand, not even required to give specific examples.
 
Sometimes a low temperature will give a higher ##K## for the reaction, but with lower temperatures come lower rates of reaction. So you might need to make a compromise!
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top