Equilibrium - Particle in Bowl, looking for guidance

m0nk3y
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Equilibrium - Particle in Bowl, looking for guidance!

Homework Statement


A point particle of mass m is confines to the frictionless surface of a sphere cal bowl. There are 2 degrees of freedom. Prove that the equilibrium point is the bottom of the bowl. Near the bottom of the bowl, what is the most general form possible for the shape of the bowl in order to maintain the stability of the equilibrium point at the bottom?

Homework Equations


spherical coordinates: rsin\thetacos\varphi + rsin\thetasin\varphi + rcos\theta
Lagrange = Kinetic Energy(T)- Potential (V)

The Attempt at a Solution


I started off by getting the Lagrange and got:
\stackrel{1}{2}r^2 (theta)'^2 - mgrcos(theta)
Then I got the E.O.M
(mr^2 (theta)'')/2 - mgsin(theta)


I have to prove that it is at equilibrium at \theta=0
But when I plug in 0 I am still left with (mr^2 (theta)'')/2
What am I doing wrong

[NOTATION::(theta)' is theta dot or velocity and (theta)'' is theta double dot or acceleration]

Any help is appreciated!
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i guess it´s not useful to go with the lagrangian just build up your potential in terms of spherical coordinates.
I guess it is V=m*g*r*sin(theta) as you said. And as in your case theta is between 0 and Pi/2
the minimum is at theta =0 because this is the lowest value sine take on [0,Pi/2]
how about that ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top