Equilibrium temperature with 2 states of matter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the final equilibrium temperature when 35g of water vapor at 380K mixes with 300g of liquid water at 300K. It is confirmed that the heat capacity of water vapor differs from that of liquid water. The calculated final temperature of about 290K raises questions, as it is lower than the initial temperature of the liquid water, suggesting heat loss during the condensation process. Additionally, it is clarified that heat capacity cannot be calculated using the enthalpy of condensation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the different properties of water in its various states.
jlau
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
You have to show your attempts, this is a forum policy. Also, all homework like questions should go to homework forum.
35g of h2o(g) at 380K flows into 300g of h2o(l) at 300K. Cp(l)=4.18kJ/K*kg and ΔH(condensation)= -2257kJ/kg.
I need to calculate the final temperature when the system reaches equilibrium.

Is the heat capacity for the h2o gas different than h2o liquid? Can you calculate heat capacity using ΔH(condensation)?

The answer I got when I used the same heat capacity was about 290K. Which I thought was odd considering the liquid water started at 300K and the gas was even hotter than that. could this be because heat was lost during condensation of the steam?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jlau said:
Is the heat capacity for the h2o gas different than h2o liquid?

Yes.

Can you calculate heat capacity using ΔH(condensation)?

No.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top