Equilibrum Concentration Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter parwana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concentration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the equilibrium concentration of I2 in the reaction H2(g) + I2(g) = 2HI at a temperature T, with initial amounts of 1.40 mol H2 and 3.50 mol I2 in a 1.00 L vessel, and an equilibrium constant K of 49.7 x 10^10. Participants express frustration with the calculations, particularly with the quadratic formula approach yielding unrealistic values for x. A more effective method is suggested, emphasizing the use of the large equilibrium constant approximation. This involves setting up an ICE table to track initial concentrations, changes, and equilibrium concentrations. By recognizing that H2 limits the reaction, participants are guided to simplify the equilibrium expression by ignoring the small x value, leading to a straightforward calculation for x. The final equilibrium concentration of I2 is approximated to be around 2.1 mol, as the small change in concentration does not significantly affect the result.
parwana
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
H2(g) + I2(g) = 2HI at a temperature T


If 1.40 mol H2 and 3.50 mol I2 are placed in a
1.00 L vessel, what is the equilibrium concentration of I2 in the gaseous mixture?
The equilibrium constant is K = 49.7 x 10 10

HINT You can use the approximation for Large Equilibrium Constants


this problem is giving me such a big headache, i mean i set up the table and it should be

49.7X10^10=[2x]^2/[1.4-x][3.5-x]

and then just use a quadratic fomula to find x, and subtract the number from 3.5, and i keep getting for x= 2.29x10^13, cause it can't be negative

please help
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
49.7X10^10=[2x]^2/[1.4-x][3.5-x]

this seems correct, there must be something with your math.
 
parwana said:
49.7X10^10=[2x]^2/[1.4-x][3.5-x]

and then just use a quadratic fomula to find x, and subtract the number from 3.5, and i keep getting for x= 2.29x10^13, cause it can't be negative
I entered that into my calculator (equation solver on a TI calculator) and it says the answer is x = 352491.1346 when the denominator in your equation is removed. x is so huge that subtracting it from something like 1.4 rounds to 0 and the calculator gets divide by 0 errors.

If you have a TI calculator, set time aside to learn everything about the equation solver. It will save you an incredible amount of time in the future.
 
do you go to SUNY stony brook? Because I do and that was one of the capa questions for this week, heh.

You have to set up the table:
H2 I2 2HI
1.4 3.5 0
-1.4 -1.4 +2(1.4)
0 2.1 2.8

The first row is the initial, second is the change to completion, third is the moles at completion...since H2 limits this reaction, you have to do your calculations based on the complete consumption of H2 and then you go from completion to equilibrium like so...

H2 I2 2HI
0 2.1 2.8
+x +x -2x
x 2.1+x 2.8-2x

so thos're are your equilibrium equations and then you set up Keq like this:

49.7x10^10 = (2.8-2x)^2/(x)(2.1-x)

since Keq is so large, you can ignore the value of x for now...so then u get this:

49.7x10^10 = (2.8)^2/(x)(2.1)

and then you simply solve for x...no quadratic equation necessary. Then you go back to your equilibrium equation for I2 which is 2.1 - x and you plug in your x value. And guess what, since x is so darn small, chances are if you put in 2.1 for your answer, you'd be right.

Hope that helps.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top