How Are the Failures of Equipartition Theory Linked to Quantum Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neelakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The failures of equipartition theory and the Rayleigh-Jeans radiation law are linked through the quantization of energy states in quantum mechanics. Equipartition theory incorrectly predicts that the specific heat of gases remains constant regardless of temperature, contradicting experimental findings. The Rayleigh-Jeans law, derived from classical assumptions, also fails to match experimental results due to similar quantization effects. In quantum mechanics, the behavior of angular momentum and energy contributions changes, leading to a temperature dependence that differs from classical predictions. Ultimately, both failures highlight the limitations of classical physics in explaining phenomena at the quantum level.
neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1
The law of equipartion of energy requires that specific heat of gases be independent of the temperature,in disagreement with the experiments.It also leads to Rayleigh-Jeans radiation law,which is also in disagreement with the experiment.What is the relation between the two failures?

What I understand,in both cases,we must take the \ h\nu\frac{1}{e^(h\nu/kT)-1} whereas the classical equipartition theory assumes kT
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Plesae bear with the bad LaTeX output.
 
Hey, no one interested!
 
I'm not an expert on the subject, but from what I understand, both failures are due to quantization of energy states. The Rayleigh-Jeans law, if I remember correctly, can be derived by realizing that the inside of a blackbody is like an infinite square well and taking into account rules about how an ensemble of bosons behaves.

An ideal gas should have a specific heat of 6/2 kB classically speaking, and this shouldn't be dependent on temperature. The reason is that the average of something that contributes quadratically to the total energy (i.e., 1/2 m v^2_x, 1/2 I \omega^2, 1/2 k x^2, etc.) is always 1/2 kB T. However, in quantum mechanics, the angular momentum contribution to the kinetic energy no longer has the form specified above. I forget what the form is exactly, it's somewhat complicated, but the important part is that, while the average of the classical angular momentum contribution is proportional to T, the average of the quantum mechanical angular momentum contribution is proportional to something else, probably T^4 (yielding a T^3 dependence for the specific heat).

So, to sum it all up, the quantization of energy states in an infinite square well is responsible for the Rayleigh-Jeans law, and the quantization of angular momentum is responsible for the temperature dependence of the specific heat.
 
I thank you for your reply.But it would be better if you clarify your write up a bit more.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top