Equivalence relations problem (algebra)

Pearce_09
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Z = all integers

A = Z; m is related to n, means that m^2 - n^2 is even;
B = {0,1}

I already proved that this is a equivalence relation, but i just don't know how to;

I need to find a well defined bejection
sigma : A_= -> B


I hope this makes sense.. i wrote it up as well as I can.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pearce_09 said:
Z = all integers
A = Z; m is related to n, means that m^2 - n^2 is even;
B = {0,1}
I already proved that this is a equivalence relation, but i just don't know how to;
I need to find a well defined bejection
sigma : A_= -> B
I hope this makes sense.. i wrote it up as well as I can.

You want a bijection from A to B?

Is that was you are looking for?

Note: If that is the case, that isn't possible.
 
I'm confused, why wouldn't that be possible??
 
A is an equivalence class,
so yes i am looking for
A_= -> B
 
A has more than two elements, where B has two elements.

If I got the definition of bijection, which I think I do, then it's not possible.
 
I could be reading the definition of the set A incorrectly.
 
no, i think A is really Z/~ where ~ is the equivalence relation given. as with any equivalence relation, the underlying set (in this case the integers) gets partitioned into cosets, in this case the one where m^2 - n^2 is even & one where it's odd, so A:=Z/~ has two elements. make sigma(one coset) = 0 or 1 & sigma(other coset) = 0 or 1 (so sigma is bijective). i don't know what the actual bijection is but that's probably how it's done. might take some fiddling.
 
fourier jr said:
no, i think A is really Z/~ where ~ is the equivalence relation given. as with any equivalence relation, the underlying set (in this case the integers) gets partitioned into cosets, in this case the one where m^2 - n^2 is even & one where it's odd, so A:=Z/~ has two elements. make sigma(one coset) = 0 or 1 & sigma(other coset) = 0 or 1 (so sigma is bijective). i don't know what the actual bijection is but that's probably how it's done. might take some fiddling.

Oh, I thought you said all elements (m and n) that satisfy that and that are in Z, which would be written as a pair is in A.

You know what. I'm really confused.
 
yes Fourier jr, that's the idea..
thanks guys for giving me a push in the right direction
 
  • #10
another way to write it is

m~n <==> m^2 \equiv n^2 (mod2) ie m^2 - n^2 \equiv 0 (mod2)

so you've got 2 possibilities: m~n or not, in which case m^2 - n^2 \equiv 1 (mod2)

(OOPS i just gave the solution away i think :blushing: )

edit: only jasonrox is allowed to read this!
 
Last edited:
  • #11
im actually going to post another question similar to this..
thanks
 
  • #12
fourier jr said:
another way to write it is
m~n <==> m^2 \equiv n^2 (mod2) ie m^2 - n^2 \equiv 0 (mod2)
so you've got 2 possibilities: m~n or not, in which case m^2 - n^2 \equiv 1 (mod2)
(OOPS i just gave the solution away i think :blushing: )
edit: only jasonrox is allowed to read this!

I see what's going on now. Thanks. :biggrin:
 
Back
Top