Equivalent Capacitance of a Circuit: Solving a Difficult Capacitance Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter shrabastee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the equivalent capacitance of a complex circuit. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the relationships between capacitance, charge, and voltage, specifically using the formulas for capacitors in series and parallel. A key point raised is whether capacitor C3 can be ignored if it carries no charge, which is valid if the other capacitors have equal capacitance, resulting in zero potential difference across C3. This simplification can significantly ease the calculation of the circuit's equivalent capacitance. Ultimately, recognizing the conditions under which certain capacitors can be disregarded is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
shrabastee
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Finding the equivalent capacitance of the supplied circuit.


Homework Equations


For parallel capacitors, C EQ.=C1+C2+C3+..
For serial capacitors, 1/C EQ.=1/C1+1/C2+...


The Attempt at a Solution



The circuit simplification is difficult!
 

Attachments

  • gview.png
    gview.png
    12.1 KB · Views: 429
Physics news on Phys.org
Here, Look at this diagram I drew for you.

It is actually the same circuit.

What can you say about the various potential differences?

Also, take note that the C=Q/V. Over here, C is specified, V and Q are unspecified. How can you make this property useful?
 

Attachments

  • Ceff.png
    Ceff.png
    3 KB · Views: 439
Thanks! Just tell me one thing, can C3 be ignored because it carries no charge?
 
That would be the case if all the capacitors except C3 have an equal capacitance. The potential difference between b and e in the diagram will be 0 and so no current will flow through C3.

The circuit will then be simpler.

And yes, C3 is ignored provided whatever is above is true.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top