Equivalent Norms: Proving No M > 0 for f

  • Thread starter Thread starter dirk_mec1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent
dirk_mec1
Messages
755
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


http://img394.imageshack.us/img394/2907/54050356xf9.png


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm stuck at exercise (e).

What I have to proof is that there is no M>0 such that:

||f'||_{\infty} \leq M \cdot ||f||_{\infty}

But I'm having a hard time showing that for there is little information on the sup of f. One way of doing this is to show that is 'M' is not constant (at least that's what I think) but because I only know that f is in C1 and f(0)=0 I don't see a way of proving this.

Can anyone give me a hint?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about polynomials.

To be more specific, try to find a sequence {f_n} of polynomials in E such that \|f_n\|_\infty = 1 for all n, while \|f_n'\|_\infty \to \infty.
 
In order to show that a general statement is NOT true you only need a counterexample. As morphism suggested look for one among simple function, like polynomials.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top