Equivalent resistance of an envelope peak detector (RF CMOS)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the equivalent resistance of an envelope peak detector using RF CMOS technology. The user initially struggled with the energy calculations and the application of the quadratic equation to derive voltage expressions. The professor's solution involved approximating the voltage function as \(v(t) = Ae^{-t/RC}\) and deriving the energy difference \(\Delta E\) to find the effective load resistance. The final conclusion indicates that the effective load resistance is approximately half the load resistance, factoring in the diode's forward resistance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quadratic equations and their applications in circuit analysis
  • Familiarity with energy calculations in electrical circuits, specifically using \(E = (1/2)CV^2\)
  • Knowledge of RF CMOS technology and envelope detection principles
  • Basic grasp of resistance calculations and the significance of load resistance in circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of energy equations in capacitive circuits, focusing on \(E = (1/2)CV^2\)
  • Learn about the small-signal approximation in circuit analysis, particularly in RF applications
  • Explore the concept of effective load resistance in diode circuits and its impact on output voltage
  • Investigate the principles of envelope detection and its applications in RF CMOS design
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, RF circuit designers, and students studying circuit analysis who are interested in understanding the intricacies of envelope peak detectors and their resistance calculations.

Jody
Gold Member
Messages
453
Reaction score
230
Homework Statement
(b) Derive an expression for when the diode turns on (with our reference convention, the peak input occurs at t=0). To simplify the derivation, feel free to assume that ##e^{-x} \approx 1-x## for small ##x##, and also that ##cos(x) \approx 1-x^2/2## for small ##x##.
(c) Assume, somewhat errorneously, that the diode turns off the moment the input reaches its peak. As measured entirely by the capacitor voltage, what is the total energy (in joules) supplied by the input source per cycle?
(d) Invoking energy equivalence is one way to define an effective resistance for a non-linear load. What we mean is this: A sinusoidal voltage source directly loaded by a resistance ##R_L## delivers a certain amount of energy to that resistive load per cycle. What equivalent value of ##R_L## connected directly to the source would consume the same amount of energy per cycle as calculated in part (c)? Express your answer in terms of ##R##.
Relevant Equations
(1) algebra, and (2) ##(1/2)CV^2##
Full problem:
dTvw5wc.png


I don't normally think about circuits like these in terms of energy (Joules) so I was very much confused.

What I did was find where the simplified expressions intercepts with each other to get the voltage. I scanned in my work although this text is a walk through of what I did. I used the simplified expressions were ##1-x## and ##1-t^2/2## although I shifted it by a period ##T##. The results is a quadratic and I chose the left side. This gives me what I think is ##t_{on}## for the diode, and I re-plug that into ##v(t)## which I'm assuming is ##A(1-x)## (I chose the left side because I think it would be easier). I set:

$$1-t = 1 - \frac{(t-T)^2}{2}$$

That leads to a quadratic assuming I can do algebra, which it depends on the day of the week so hopefully I'm posting this on a Wednesday

$$0 = t^2 - 2t(T+1) + T^2$$

Quadratic equation, and I chose the left side because it lands on the left side of that curve on ##T##

$$t = (T+1) - \sqrt{2T+1}$$

I plug that into ##v(t) = A(1-t)## line

$$v(t) = A(1 - [(T+1) - \sqrt{2T+1}]) = A(\sqrt{2T + 1} - T)$$

This part above is where I'm uncomfortable because it's all still black magic just math to me and I'm not feeling like I'm understanding earning something from that work. Then I'm thinking I need to enter it into ##E = (1/2)CV^2## an equation that's not from this book but I've seen it before, and the professor has agreed with me when I suggested it to him; however: This becomes really nasty and non-sensible at least in its current form. I go with it anyways and get the energy difference I call ##\Delta E##.

$$\Delta E = (1/2)C(V_1^2 - V_2^2) = (1/2)C(A^2 - A^2(1 - [(T+1) - \sqrt{2T+1}]) = A(\sqrt{2T + 1} - T)^2)$$

$$\Delta E = (1/2)CA^2 (1 - (\sqrt{2T+1} - T)^2)$$

I'm thinking... okay the units should be in Joules and I know that power is usually in Watts, which is the same as Joules per second. Maybe I could convert this back into the a sinusoid using the simplification and then use the same ##R## as a sinusoidal, but the form doesn't fit too well. If I try just ##V^2## it looks like it's going to turn into a bunch of non-meaningful garbage with some square root of the period. I'm pretty stumped at how to take my work and turn it into ##R_L## and how to include ##R##... not even sure if I'm on the right path.

edit: erm more thoughts about converting it back to cosine doesn't make sense because it would be constant :( I'm a bit baffled at that next step or how to make the conversion. I suppose I could just do the Joules over time if I got it right, but not sure how to get that ##R## in there.

My work:
MjDexP4.png

c45yvhp.png


edit:

Professor posted his solutions. I'll share the strategy for future readers. Hrm for me this was really unintuitive I'm kind of surprised at how far I even got haha.

His strategy was to call ##v(t) = Ae^{-t/RC} \approx A(1-t/RC)## for that downward slope on the left side and then the right side parabolic one ##A(1-0.5(\omega t - 2\pi)^2)## (this one is from the small angle cosine simplification). He then set those two equal and solved for the quadratic for ##t##.

The part that I scribbled out in my work was on the right track ##\Delta E = 0.5CA^2 - 0.5C(A(1-t/RC))^2## he assumes that ##t/RC## is a really small number you can neglect.

The conversion to resistance ##\Delta E = V_{rms}^2 T / R## (just solved for ##\Delta E## in the previous step and so you can rearrange it for ##R##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe that the effective load resistance presented to the input of the detector is approximately half the load resistance. If the diode forward resistance is significant, then the input resistance will also be higher but the output voltage will be smaller.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K