Comparing Escape Energies of Earth, Moon, and Jupiter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the escape energies from Earth, the Moon, and Jupiter, emphasizing the relationship between escape velocity and gravitational potential energy. The key formula used is the energy equation, which equates kinetic energy to gravitational potential energy at the point of escape. Participants express confusion about whether to use the radius of the planet or the distance to infinity in their calculations. Correct answers for the energy multiples are provided as 0.0451 for the Moon and 28.5 for Jupiter. The concept of escape energy is clarified as the energy required to reach an infinite distance with zero kinetic energy.
popo902
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What multiple of the energy needed to escape from Earth gives the energy needed to escape from (a) the Moon and (b) Jupiter? Use the Table (link below) if necessary

http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1650/art/qb/qu/c13/fig13-19.gif


Homework Equations



1/2mv^2 - GMm/r = 0 (energy)
v = sqrt(2GM/R)

The Attempt at a Solution



for the potential energy, do i put in the radius of the planet instead of the distance between it and something? because there's nothing else there...

at first i figured that the potential will be zero anyway because once you escape, r would be infinity and make the potential 0
then i fiugured that only v mattered in comparing the amount of energy because the mas of the projectial would be the same, the only difference would be escape speed.
but i got it wrong

these are supposedly the rigth answers
a)0.0451
b) 28.5

im very confused...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi popo902! :smile:

the energy needed to escape is defined as the energy needed to reach infinite distance at zero speed (ie at KE = 0) …

(of course, it's 1/2 mv2, where v is escape velocity )

since KE + PE = constant, that means that the escape KE is the difference in PE between the planet's surface and infinity. :wink:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top