Estimating image distance in lens and mirror

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShineyPenny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image Lens Mirror
AI Thread Summary
Estimating the location of an image in a lens or mirror can be confusing, particularly when applying the correct formulas. The discussion highlights the importance of using the thin lens equation, which is often not included in textbooks. A participant initially misapplied values and struggled with the focal length's sign, leading to incorrect calculations. After clarification, it was confirmed that the textbook had an error, and the correct calculation yielded an image distance of approximately 5.33 cm. Understanding the proper application of the thin lens equation is crucial for accurate image distance estimation.
ShineyPenny
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm having difficulty understanding how to estimate the location of an image in a lens/mirror.

I tried understanding it by going off the books question/answer section:
"A spherical concave lens has a focal length of 16 cm, and an object is placed 8 cm from the lens." It says the answer is 6.0 cm.

What formula is being used, I cannot figure out how they got 6 cm? All I see in the book for formulas is f=R/2 and R=2f.


I'm confused :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a lens, it's usually called the "thin lens equation", sometimes with "Gaussian" in front of it. Your textbook surely has it. Try the index at the end of the book. :smile:

The two formulas you named, give the focal length of a mirror with radius R. There's a similar (but a bit more complicated) formula for the focal length of a lens, which is usually called the "lensmaker's equation." But you don't need that for this problem.

Oh, and either you left out a minus sign, or the book has a typographical error, or it's being deliberately sneaky. A concave lens has a negative focal length, not positive.
 
OK, I believe I have it after running a search for it...it's actually not in the book :(Is the equation:

(1/Object Distance)+(1/Focal Length) = (1/image location)
(1/45) + (1/36) = .05; then (1/.05) = 5.999

This is it? I'm just making sure :)
 
It's actually usually written as

\frac{1}{o} + \frac {1}{i} = \frac {1}{f}

where o, i and f are object distance, image distance and focal length. Some books use s and s', or p and q, instead of o and i.

Why are you using 45 and 36 for object distance and focal length, when your original problem had 8 and 16? (actually -16 because it has to be negative as I said before)
 
I have no idea where 45 and 16 came from, sorry it was a long night :blushing:

I input (1/8o) + (1/-16i) = .0625f, then go (1/.0625f) and come out with 16.

Either I'm missing something big, or I haven't drank enough coffee this morning. I even plugged the numbers into this website (http://www.photonics.byu.edu/Thin_Lens_Calc.phtml) and it's not coming up with 6 cm for the image location.


Sorry, I'm not a math person but I'm trying to grasp this :confused:
 
OK

I have figured it out, the book is wrong and it was verified by the professor :)

I inputted: (1/16f) + (1/8o) = .1875, then (1/.1875)= 5.33.They did not use a negative sign.Thank you! =)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top