Estimating Number of Stars in Milky Way Galaxy: Kepler Problem Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter CinderBlockFist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kepler
AI Thread Summary
To estimate the number of stars in the Milky Way galaxy, one can calculate the galaxy's mass by treating it as if all mass is concentrated at its center. Given the Sun's mass and its orbital characteristics, the total mass can be derived using gravitational dynamics. The average mass of stars is assumed to be equivalent to that of the Sun. By dividing the total mass of the galaxy by the mass of the Sun, a rough estimate of the number of stars can be obtained. This method simplifies the complex distribution of stars within the galaxy.
CinderBlockFist
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Our Sun, with mass 2.0 1030 kg, revolves about the center of the Milky Way galaxy, which is 2.2 1020 m away, once every 2.5 108 years. Assuming that each of the stars in the galaxy has a mass equal to that of our Sun, that the stars are distributed uniformly in a sphere about the galactic center, and that our Sun is essentially at the edge of that sphere, estimate roughly the number of stars in the galaxy.

How can i find this answer if the stars don't fill up the space because they are spheres?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Compute the galaxy's mass and divide it to the mass of the sun (i assumed that the average mass of a star is roughly equal to the one of the sun).

Daniel.
 
It doesn't matter that the stars don't fill space. Treat it as if all mass were concentrated at the center of the galaxy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top