Estimating the receiving signal strength 2.4ghz

In summary, you can't connect the Arduino to the receiver to measure the signal strength. It would be extremely difficult to do so and would be inaccurate. Instead, use a GPS system to determine the distance between the transmitter and receiver.
  • #1
Oxieee
8
0
Hello every1 .. i am sophomore so excuse me if i ask anything stupid/obviouse.

so there are allot of proximity devices but with short range so i was thinking of making one with 2.4Ghz ℝℂ tx & rx. these typicaly have range to about 1km.

So all i want to know is if there is a way to connect the arduino or sumthing to the RECEIVER at any channel or at the antenna so i can measure the strength of the signal being received from the transmitter and hence estimate the distance from the transmitter. It doesn't have to be accurate.

→→→THANXX gr8 forum!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Estimating distance to transmitter unfortunately isn't that easy
The are just so many variables that come into play... To name a few...
Tx power
Rx sensitivity
Antenna gains at each end
Are you getting a direct signal or a reflected signal or a mixture of both
( this last one would be the biggest killer to distance estimates over a relatively short distance)

Now radar works very differently by working out the time delay of receiving the reflected pulse off some object. But for a relatively straightforward TX and RX system distance measurement would be extremely difficult.

Now if you have the tx and rx sync'ed and timing done very accurately ...with the transmitter sending out pulses you would be able to time the delay in the arrival of the pulse from the transmitter. But over such a short distance, say less than a few kilometers and with the radio pulses traveling at the speed of light, the delay times are going to be absolutely tiny! And could easily be masked by inaccuracies in your sync'ing system and general timing quality

Dave
 
Last edited:
  • #3
RF propagation involves so many different variables that you can't hope to do better than just a 'rough estimate' of the distance traveled by a signal. (Cosmologists are stuck with this method for measuring the distances of really distant objects and they are grateful for ball-park figures).

GPS is good and works on the principle of measuring the differences in arrival times of signals from a number of different satellites. Ancient (about 50 years ago, I think) systems likeDecca did the same sort of thing by having a number of base stations, synchronised to each other. The receiver compared the relative phases of signals received from each station and could place itself on a grid of hyperbolic lines, on a chart.

Though, actually, you are talking in terms of a couple of km separation so why not use smart phones, GPS and a navigation app to tell where the two terminals are and communicate that info by 3G? All the tek is there for you (you probably have it in your pocket right now) and you can tweet your friends at the same time.
 

FAQ: Estimating the receiving signal strength 2.4ghz

How do you estimate receiving signal strength for 2.4ghz?

The receiving signal strength for 2.4ghz can be estimated by using a wireless signal strength meter or by analyzing the signal strength on a network analyzer software. These tools measure the signal strength in decibels (dBm) and can provide an accurate estimation of the receiving signal strength.

What factors can affect the receiving signal strength for 2.4ghz?

Several factors can affect the receiving signal strength for 2.4ghz, including distance from the source, obstacles (such as walls or furniture), interference from other electronic devices, and the quality of the wireless router or access point.

How can I improve the receiving signal strength for 2.4ghz?

There are several ways to improve the receiving signal strength for 2.4ghz. These include placing the wireless router or access point in a central location, avoiding obstacles between the router and the device, using a high-gain antenna, and adjusting the router's settings to reduce interference.

Is 2.4ghz the best frequency for wireless signals?

It depends on the specific use case. 2.4ghz is a commonly used frequency for wireless signals due to its ability to travel through walls and other obstacles. However, it can be prone to interference and may not provide the best performance for high-bandwidth activities. Other frequencies, such as 5ghz, may be better suited for certain applications.

How do I know if the receiving signal strength for 2.4ghz is strong enough?

The strength of the receiving signal for 2.4ghz can vary depending on the specific device and its capabilities. However, a general rule of thumb is that a signal strength of -70dBm or higher is considered good, while anything below -80dBm may result in slower speeds or dropped connections. It is recommended to test the signal strength in different areas of the space to ensure a strong and consistent connection.

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
13K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top