Estimation of number of Carbon atoms in bacterium

AI Thread Summary
To estimate the number of carbon atoms in a bacterium like E. coli, one can start by calculating the moles of glucose in a 0.2% solution, then determine the moles of carbon and use Avogadro's number to find the total number of carbon atoms. The discussion also explores the feasibility of using the volume of glucose molecules to estimate carbon content, though it is noted that this approach may yield inaccurate results due to the high water content in bacteria. Additionally, the potential number of cells that can be grown in a 5 mL culture before depleting the carbon source is a key consideration. Accurate calculations require careful consideration of the bacterium's composition and the medium's characteristics. Overall, a systematic approach using molar mass and Avogadro's number is essential for solving the problem effectively.
Krazer101
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Minimal growth medium for bacteria such as E. coli includes various salts with characteristic concentrations of mM and carbon source. This carbon source is typically glucose and it is used at 0.2% ( a concentration of 0.2g/100mL).

a) Make an estimate of the number of carbon atoms it takes to make up the macromolecular contents of a bacterium such as E. coli.

b) How many cells can be grown in a 5 mL culture using minimal medium before the medium exhausts the carbon?


Homework Equations


Molar mass, Avagadro's number


The Attempt at a Solution


I first started out by taking the concentration of .2g/100mL and figured out the mol of glucose per 100mL. Then I found mol of carbon and through Avagadro's number, I found the number of atoms per 100mL. Is this the right method?

I also thought of finding the volume of glucose molecules and dividing the volumes to find the amount of glucose molecules in the bacterium and finding the number of carbon atoms through that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Either I am missing something completely, or you have to find some additional data to solve the question.

Using volumes of a single E. coli and glucose molecule is not a completely bad idea, but - as most of the bacterium is water - it will give incorrect result. But at least you will know what order of magnitude we are talking.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top