Evaluate the following limit without using L'Hospital's rule?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
AI Thread Summary
The limit in question is evaluated as e^(-2) without using L'Hospital's rule. Participants suggest rewriting the limit and making a substitution, specifically using ln x = u, to simplify the evaluation. A key point discussed is the limit property that states lim (n→∞) (1 + 1/n)^n = e, which aids in the evaluation process. There is also a mention of a potential error in the original problem statement from a booklet. The discussion emphasizes understanding the limit's behavior as x approaches infinity.
Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Can someone please show me, if possible, how to evaluate the following limit without using L'Hospital's rule?

<br /> \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } \left( {1 - \frac{2}{{\log _e n}}} \right)^{\log _e n} <br />

The answer is e^(-2).

Rewriting the terms in the bracket as a single term doesn't appear to get me anywhere. I tried taking the logarithm and exponentiating the limit but that still ended up requiring me to use L'Hospital's rule. Any help with evaluating the limit without using L'Hospital's rule would be good thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is fairly straightforward...you need to know that

<br /> \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {1 + \frac{1}{{n}}} \right)^{n} = e <br />

Hope that helps...

Cheers
vivek
 
U misstyped it.

Assuming you're dealing with

\lim_{x\rightarrow +\infty}\left(1-\frac{2}{\ln x}\right)^{\ln x}

,then i advise u to male the obvious substitution

\ln x= u

and then use the definition of "e"...

Daniel.
 
It's a bit late, I haven't been online for a while, but thanks for the replies. There might be an error in my booklet but that's exactly(but without the base e, in the subject I'm taking it's assumed that the base is e) how the limit is written in my book.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top