Evaluating an exponential of a really large negative number

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter flatmaster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential Negative
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 7K views
flatmaster
Messages
497
Reaction score
2
As a kid, I remember my father saying "there's a small chance that an electron in your body is on the moon" Well, today I decided to calculate the odds. Among the assumptions I made to make math easier.

*Ground state wave function of Hydrogen
*the moon is a cube of sides 2r. where r is the radius of the moon.
*Ignore gravity

Setting the origin at earth, you simply integrate over the volume of the moon in spherical coordinates.

I don't have the result on me now, so I'm guessing at what I got. I think I eliminated some pi's and constants because it's an order of magnitude kind of situation.

{ (rm^2)e^(-ro/ao) } / (ro^2)

rm - radius of the moon
ro - radius of the moon's orbit
ao - bohr radius

My question, the term e^(-ro/ao) is an exponential of a huge negative number. The grapher on this mac makes things look pretty, but it can't crunch numbers. How would you evaluate this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For numerical evaluation of large (negative or positive) powers of e, convert first to a power of 10, by multiplying the exponent by log10e. The rest is obvious.
 
So I want to take both sides of the equation to the log10e power?
 
Well... uh, sort of. You'll want to use the identity
[tex]e^{-r_0/a_0} = 10^{-(r_0/a_0)\log e}[/tex]
So just figure out what [itex](-(r_0/a_0)\log e)[/itex] is, and then if it's, say, -1000000000 you'll have an answer like "10 to the -1000000000 power" or whatever. Since it's just an order-of-magnitude thing, that's good enough.
 
Ok. I atleast see that that equation is balanced. Good enough for me.

What a crazy chance diazona, My calculations end up with...

p = 10^-(10^8) = 10^-10,000,000
 
I'd like to see a cubic moon actually.