Evaluating Expressions with Kronecker Delta

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hendrick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Expressions
Hendrick
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Simplify/Evaluate these expressions involving the Kronecker delta, using Einstein's summation convention:
a)\delta_{qr}\delta_{rp}\delta_{pq}
b)\delta_{pp}\delta_{qr}\delta_{rq}

Homework Equations


\delta_{ij}=0 when i =/= j
\delta_{ij}=1 when i = j


The Attempt at a Solution


a)\delta_{qr}\delta_{rp}\delta_{pq}
=\delta_{qp}\delta_{pq}
=\delta_{qq} = 3 (summation over repeated q)

b)\delta_{pp}\delta_{qr}\delta_{rq}
=\delta_{pp}\delta_{qq}
=(3)(3)
=9
[Am I actually able to evaluate the \delta_{qr}\delta_{rq} part before the \delta_{pp} part, I mean you can't do that with matrices... :S]


Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what you did is correct. If you think of them as matrices, remember they are identity matrices, so they commute with everything, so the order does not matter.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top