Evaluating the Coulomb Integral of Helium

Trolle
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement, all variables, equations and given/known data
¨
Hi guys. I am working on solving the stationary Schrôdinger equation of the Helium atom by the variational method using a Slater determinant constructed from Slater type 1s orbitals, and in that respect i need to solve the Coulomb integral:

J = \int_ {R^3} \int_{R^3} \frac{e^{-\zeta r_1}e^{\zeta r_2}}{|\vec{r_1}-\vec{r_2}|}d^3r_1 d^3r_2

where \vec{r}_n denotes the position of the n'th electron with respect to the nucleus and R^3 denotes that the integral is over all three dimensional space wheras d^3 r symbolises an infinitesemal volume element. r_n is the distance between the n'th electron and the nucleus whereas \zeta is the variational parameter ( a constant with respect to the integral).

I know this might be a bit difficult to solve, but if any of you could give a hint or direct me to appropriate (preferably free) reading i would be very happy.

Thanks - Mads

Edit: I may have posted this in the wrong thread. Sorry if that is the case - just ignore.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like the integral diverges... hard.
I don't know if this is anywhere near correct, but I would do the following.

Note that if you combine the exponents, everything only depends on the distance r = r_1 - r_2, through
J = \iint \frac{e^{-\zeta r}}{|r|} d^3r_1 d^3r_2
Now suppose for a moment that you knew that r > 0. Then you could switch to polar coordinates and get
J = 4 \pi^2 V \int_0^\infty \frac{e^{-\zeta r}}{r} r^2 \, dr.
The integral converges if \operatorname{Re}(\zeta) > 0. However, you have one integral left, which I have symbolically denoted by V: the volume over which you integrate. If that is R3, then
V = \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} d\vec r = \infty.
Moreover, if we also allow r to be negative, then we have to do a similar integral:
J = 4 \pi^2 V \int_0^\infty \frac{e^{\zeta r}}{r} r^2 \, dr
where the integral only converges if the real part of zeta is negative this time. So adding the two gives something infinite (V) times something which is only finite when zeta has no real part (and then goes like 1 / zeta^2).

Haven't thought really deeply about it though, so maybe there is some little mistake somewhere which makes everything work out OK...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top